music

For
several years running, my middle school hosted the Solo and Ensemble Festival
for our southeastern Michigan region, always held on the first Saturday in
December. That meant that thousands of middle school musicians, plus their
parents, piano accompanists and indulgent grandmothers descended on my middle
school for a day of nervous renditions of "Little Fugue."

There
are more than 40 middle schools in the region, so that also meant hanging with a
volunteer workforce of a few dozen orchestra and band teachers, pulling 12-hour
shifts on a Saturday. Every year, at least one of them would express surprise
at the wreath hanging on the counselor's door, the (ugly, scrawny) Christmas
tree in the office--and the marching lineups and drum assignments for the
annual Fantasy of Lights parade
posted in the band room. 

"How
do you get away with that?" I was often asked. At many schools in nearby
Oakland County, the student population is much more ethnically and spiritually diverse.
Many of my counterparts were doing winter concerts where the musical literature
was tightly scrutinized for religious imbalance and stealth piety. Ironically,
many of them were selecting literature based on mildly schizophrenic policies
that allowed them to play masterworks--such as For Unto Us a Child is Born--on the theory that they were
"educational," but forbade secular tunes like Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas because--duh!--the word
"Christmas" was in the title.

Most
school policy on Christmas music--and performance of other traditional and
ethnic holiday compositions--falls somewhere between muddled and nonexistent; a
fair number of directives get added when someone complains at a school board
meeting. And a large segment of school personnel and the general population
profoundly misunderstand the elasticity, purpose and intent of the First
Amendment. It's not about boldly defying the separation of church and state
(although some people want to fight that specious battle endlessly). Charles
Haynes, First Amendment scholar, expresses this beautifully in a must-read
article
:

The First
Amendment solution is stunningly simple: Schools should plan holiday programs
that are educational in purpose and balanced in content. Nothing in the First
Amendment prohibits public schools from educating students about music,
religious and secular, as part of a comprehensive music program that exposes
students to a variety of traditions and cultures.

Haynes
also notes that one Merry Hyatt of California is now collecting signatures to
put a referendum on the November 2010 ballot requiring all public schools in California to include Christmas music
in classroom activities, every December. Haynes thinks that even if the
referendum passed (and I get a little queasy thinking about the mileage Bill O'
Reilly could get out of that one), it would be overturned on constitutional
grounds.

Really--does
this need to be a fight? We're a diverse country. Teaching children to
appreciate the range and beauty of cultural traditions is something we ought to
be endorsing in every public school, no matter which holidays a majority of
students celebrate. Most people who hail each other in this season, whether
they say "Happy Holidays" or "Merry Christmas"--or any
other greeting--are not proclaiming religious fervor. They're trying to be
friendly and social. Good cheer in dark times.

There
is not and never has never been a "War on Christmas." Everyone in
America gets Christmas, for weeks, whether they want it or not. The First
Amendment lets us sort this out, school by school, keeping educational integrity
uppermost. School leaders can serve as models of inclusive and respectful
citizenship--a more admirable goal than majority domination.

For
those who insist that all middle school bands play Christmas music, I propose a
mandatory winter holiday parade. A few years marching in sleet ought to make
any "War on Christmas" zealot think twice.

In
his marvelous 1977 book, On Teaching, Herb Kohl suggests that
teachers should read the books their students love, and listen seriously to the
music that engages the young people they teach.

Teachers, Kohl says, cannot
expect students to eagerly embrace the literature and arts their teachers deem classic,
beautiful or essential for an educated person, unless teachers return the favor
and seriously honor their students' tastes and preferences.

You
might argue that Kohl wrote those words before Lady Gaga was even born--and was
younger himself in the post-Woodstock era when On Teaching was
written. But he has a point. Our aesthetic values and ideals begin forming when
we are children, shaped by the arts that surround us. The goal is broad
experience, learning to draw knowledge and pleasure from a wide range of
artistic sources. If nothing else, listening to the music our students love can
be seen as a useful exercise in anthropology.

My
late mother-in-law--may she rest in peace--was convinced that my husband was at
Woodstock in 1969, and concealed this fact from his parents for decades. It's
not true--he was actually in Ann Arbor, safely grinding away at another boring
summer job. But in her mind, he was just the kind of rebellious hippy youth who
would hitchhike across the country to listen to all that racket. 

Craig
Wilson, in USA Today, makes the case
that the music at Woodstock was glorified racket, pretty much--the
half-a-million-strong experience, the mud and the enthusiasm being the classic
and essential parts. Only a handful of the musical performances at Woodstock were
truly memorable and lots of musicians turned in marginal work, possibly because
electrocution was a distinct possibility at any moment.

Wilson
goes on to say that few would call Woodstock the best concert ever--and that what
makes a live performance unforgettable is probably a combination of arbitrary circumstances,
judgment and brilliance, an alignment of the listener's personal stars. In the
past 40 years, I have been to literally thousands of concerts. One of my life
regrets is not keeping a list of all the concerts I've seen (although a list of
all the concerts I've played would certainly be longer and--perhaps
surprisingly--less interesting). Perhaps a meticulously kept list would spoil
the spontaneous response to this question:

Best concert
ever?

For
me, as a formally trained musician, the answer would necessarily be divided
into two distinct captions--art music and popular music. I've seen most of the
major symphony orchestras in the U.S., and a number of Famous Classical
Musicians live. For dazzling talent, I would choose Cecilia Bartoli, at Hill
Auditorium. For pure listening pleasure, nothing came close to seeing the
Empire Brass at the Wharton Center. For artistic excellence and
heart-in-the-throat richness of sound, my favorite "classical"
ensemble is the Cleveland Symphony (although hearing them in Severance Hall may
have something to do with it).

On
the popular music side, I offer a top five: Richard Thompson at the Michigan
Theatre in Ann Arbor, an evening chock-full of irony and artistry. For pure
fun, the Subdudes at the Ark in Ann Arbor. Randy Newman, solo at the piano, at
the Royal Oak Theatre (we were in the front row, I was nine months pregnant,
and I remember hoping fervently that all the research about what babies could
hear in the womb was true). First runner-up: a tribute concert for Lowell
George
, at the L.A. Forum, back in 1979. Nearly all my favorite musicians were
on the program, which went on for hours. When I got in line for popcorn, Laraine
Newman
was ahead of me. I have kept the T-shirt for 30 years, even though it's
size x-small.

My
all-time favorite concert has to be seeing Stevie Wonder at Cobo Hall in
Detroit, back in the 70s. Stevie Wonder is always exciting and fresh, but he
was home that night, musically and emotionally. Our seats weren't that great,
but I was caught up in the feeling of being part of Stevie's family and his
generous passion. Signed, sealed, delivered: best concert ever.

Image: NYC_Comet, Flickr Creative Commons

 Help
me out here, teachers. When you're weary and feeling small and so on--where do
you turn for musical inspiration? What songs and artists ring your good-teacher
chimes? If you never use music in this way, preferring chocolate, text-messaging
in the lounge, or watching "Freedom Writers" on HBO again, I'd like
to suggest that music has tremendous power to leverage personal and systemic change.
What music is your personal door to hope and sunshine?

I
have painted this verbal picture to my students many times:

Imagine
a well-dressed, prosperous man and woman from an earlier generation, he in topcoat
and fedora, she in leather gloves and a coat with a fur collar. In this black
and white film, they are looking almost rapturously off into the distance.
Between them is a little girl, holding their hands, her sweet face framed by a hat,
tied with a big bow under her chin. They all appear to be speaking, looking
excitedly at something far away. As the camera moves back, we begin to hear the
soundtrack. The family of three is singing--and soon we see and hear that they
are part of a large throng of people, all of whom are singing with great fervor
and pride. The perspective widens; the crowd is massive, and they are all
focused on a single man standing on a balcony. 

The
man is Adolph Hitler. The song they are singing is Deustschland Uber Alles ("Germany Above All").  Songs are powerful, I tell my students. Songs
can unify nations (or 100,000 Michigan fans in the Big House, something that
many of them have personally experienced)--or send men willingly into battle. A
good song can bring tears to our eyes, stir jubilant memories --or make us get
up and dance. Hitler, using cheap crystal radios, effectively turned patriotic
music into a terrible and authoritarian social movement. I saw the film clip
described above at the Holocaust Museum in Washington, D.C.

How
about a more benign and progressive movement: music to honor and inspire the
work of teachers? Music
to lift their spirits and help them find their common joys? I will be meeting
with a few educators next week to work on a teacher leadership project, and I
want to bring them a mix CD of songs for teacher leaders.

Songs
that I have considered: If I Were Brave,
Have a Little Faith,
and One Love (from
the Playing for Change CD--where all
the songs could be considered germane to teaching, learning, believing in the
power of the human spirit to educate). My friend and fellow traveler Mary
Tedrow sent a link to Born Again American,
a rallying cry if there ever was one. I wonder: is it too political to be
included in a CD of songs for teacher leadership? Then I decide that teacher
leadership is all about politics.

Help
me out here. Please send suggestions for the very best music--a little jazz, a
little country, a little rock and roll--for teachers.

 

Thanks to my
friend Rosemary Woods for the wonderful image, shot a couple days ago in Tucson.

Two
weeks ago, I spent a Saturday traveling to the century-old District Library in
Jackson, Michigan
, one of more than 2500 beautiful public libraries--on three
continents--funded by industrial magnate and innovative philanthropist Andrew
Carnegie. The draw was a workshop on using research in writing, plus a luncheon
keynote featuring one of my favorite authors, Diana Gabaldon. Gabaldon took
questions after the workshop and the keynote--and both times, someone in the
audience asked her who Jamie (a character running through most of her novels)
looks like. As in--which living person, preferably a star, served as model for
your hero?

Both
times, Gabaldon gently demurred, saying that while she had an image of Jamie, readers should create their own vision.
This was not an answer that pleased the audience; there was the sense that they
wanted a name--or better yet, a color photo. And at my table, a Gabaldon reader
confessed that she starts all books by turning to the last pages--to see (her
words) "who died and who got together." Only with that concrete information could she start reading.

There's
plenty of evidence that students in this media-saturated world are losing their
capacity for rich imagination.  One of my
favorite instructional strategies in teaching middle school music is structured
role play. Assigning students a character to inhabit-- rock star, entertainment
lawyer, singing monk-- is a powerful way to force them to "think
different.
" There's always a subgroup of students who resist, claiming
they don't know what to do or say-- "Can't you just write it down, so I
can read it?" Explaining divergent thinking--or the endless possibilities
for changing one's narrative-- isn't always helpful. They're looking for the right
answer.

Turning
kids on to different kinds of music--every music teacher's #1 goal--is an
exercise in developing the imagination, particularly for band and orchestra
teachers who can't use lyrics as a means of illumination.  I remember one stunning moment back in the
80s, rehearsing a sensitive passage with my 8th grade band.  A young man raised his hand and said it might
be easier to play the piece if we knew what it was about. I replied that people
didn't ask Beethoven what his fifth symphony was about, but he persisted,
saying "You know, like on MTV, where you can see what songs are
about?"

That
comment sent me on an enduring quest to embed the ideas of imagination and
inspiration (literally, "drawing breath") into my classroom pedagogy.
Musicians use a range of non-visual and non-literary tools to represent
emotion, story, purpose and occasion. Part of musical imagination is
craftsmanship--having the knowledge and skills to create. But another part is
the willingness to be playful, to recombine familiar elements into something
new, to take a risk or wait on inspiration. My students had some rudimentary
knowledge and skills. What they didn't have was permission to honor or evaluate
their own interpretations and images.

As
much as I would like to pin my worries about diminished imagination in children
on MTV and a thousand other always-on media sources, I can't. Media, whether
brilliant or boring, is only the product.  Imagination is a process. A process fed and
honed by comprehension and competence--but also the ability to delay
gratification, to fool around with ideas. The women at the library who wanted
to see the definitive picture of their fictional hero, or know how the story
turns out before reading, were lacking the capacity to suspend fulfillment and
tinker with possibility. They wanted the answer.

Einstein
is famous for  declaring that imagination is more important
than knowledge. Here's the rest of that quote: "For knowledge is
limited to all we now know and understand, while imagination embraces the
entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand.”

Imagination
is a real thing. It belongs in every vision or proposal for what our children
should learn, preparing for their 21st century lives.

So yeah, I'm on Facebook now, too, like 90 million other people (no--seriously--it's up to 90 million). And it sure is fun hearing about how everyone is cleaning their garage, hiring a babysitter, or getting a fat-free caramel latte (venti)....

It’s customary to express thanks this week. This is more than a perfunctory, blog-filling exercise—gratitude is learned and must be practiced, as any parent or teacher can testify. I remember many family Thanksgiving dinners where my children, nieces and nephews...

It’s customary to express thanks this week. This is more than a perfunctory, blog-filling exercise—gratitude is learned and must be practiced, as any parent or teacher can testify. I remember many family Thanksgiving dinners where my children, nieces and nephews...

As a professional flutist, I frequently play for weddings, funerals and other life-transition occasions. Last Saturday, I was honored to provide memorial service music for a friend’s brother, who died way too young. Selecting music in tribute to a contemporary...

You've heard the song many times before, but did you ever really notice the violin part?  Yes, pull out your Motown compilation or Best of Marvin Gaye CD, and check out the violin!  Ever since I started my fiddling lessons, I've been hearing more violin/fiddle in pop music.  In addition to the artists I mentioned in the last blog entry, The Beatles, Kansas, and 10,000 Maniacs would come to mind right away, but then I started hearing the violin in U2 ("One Tree Hill") and in songs by The Arcade Fire.  Caught a little bit of "Your Song" by Elton John on the radio, and... oh yeah, a whole string section I forgot about.  Somewhat immersed in my new learning, I find connections more easily, with each one reinforcing my choice and my interest in pursuing my new instrument.

As a guitarist, I've also been in the habit sometimes of imagining what riff I would add to a song I'm listening to.  (That habit actually started before I played guitar, when I worked at The Gap in high school; the piped in music was so redundant I had to quietly whistle some additions to the songs in order to stay sane).  But now, instead of trying to hear room for my guitar solo, I'm listening to songs trying to hear where I'd add a fiddle track.  So, in my head, I'm off to a pretty good start!

As far as actually, you know, playing the instrument, progress is slow.  One issue I'm dealing with is never having learned to read music.  Now I'm at a point where I'd like to - I see the advantage - but I also want to learn to play more songs more quickly, and I can do that by ear more than by reading.  When I try to read music, I'm looking at too many things at once.  My fingerwork with my left hand is in decent shape for a beginner, because of prior experience with mandolin and guitar, but I do still need to watch what I'm doing.  I also need to watch my bow a fair amount of the time.  This is the part that's totally new - trying to keep the bow straight, and changing the angle so that I'm bowing the correct string.  Trying to look at the sheet music at the same time is generally too much.  How do I look in three places at once?  So even when I'm motivated, I find some substantial obstacles to address.  Shortcuts right now might be gratifying for a while, but will I form bad habits that inhibit my progress even more later?  Or is motivation the key that will get me through any door?

One thing I have going for me is the willingness to be "aggressive" with my playing.  My instructor, Jack, says that when your fiddle isn't producing the right sound or enough of it, the solution is often in playing harder, leaning into your mistake rather than backing off. Too light a touch on the strings produces screeches and whistles.  Turns out I had a decent, intuitive feel for this idea - not applying it consistently yet, but when I made the mistake, I knew what I had done wrong right away.  With my students, I like to talk about leaning into our discomfort, taking risks, allowing that mistakes are part of learning if you're learning anything worthy of your time and effort.  

Lessons are on a short hiatus as Jack and I can't coordinate schedules.  How much longer can I play the same few songs and scales?  Maybe long enough to make them sound good enough for my TLN blog...?  Or maybe that's just going to be my tease line for a long, long time.

 

 Tonight, I had my first fiddle lesson.  Actually, it was also my first musical lesson of any type.  I've muddled through as a self-taught guitar player for over twenty years, and even taught myself a little mandolin.  (I bought one after John Hiatt came out with Cry Love  - anyone else know that one?)  I plan to use this blog to record my progress and collect thoughts about learning and teaching.

I inherited the instrument from my grandfather.  He was an opera singer in his early adulthood, and would sing for anyone, anywhere, anytime at all.  I'm sorry to say I always felt a bit embarrassed when he'd begin to belt out a song in a deli or something like that, but he really could sing.  He also played the violin, though I only saw him do it once or twice.  Grandpa Jack passed away almost a decade ago, and his violin went into its case and then into a thick roll of bubble wrap, which I later found at my mother's house.

The idea of that instrument sitting in its case for decades displeased me, so I decided I had to learn to play it.  The mandolin is not too different in size, and has the same tuning, so I even came to the violin with some of the left hand skills.  First I took the violin to a local fellow who builds and repairs violins.  All the comments about his business online suggest that Larry seems a bit crazy, but he does great work for reasonable prices.  He's a one-man operation in a small second-story office above a local florist shop.  Larry informed me that the violin was a German model, over eighty years old.  He refurbished the instrument - new strings and chin piece, repaired bridge, and he sold me a new bow for less than restringing the old one would cost.  But just as important, Larry got me excited to play, so I went right home and gave it a shot.  

My family was amazed at my instant success.  My family is way too easily impressed, because while I might have avoided some of the dying cat sounds you think of when a child starts violin, my pitch needed major adjustments and my bow was all over the place. I knew I'd need some lessons, so I began calling around.

In my next entry, find out what I figured out about violin lessons, fiddle lessons, teachers, and myself as a student.  And since this blog tool has a "Post Audio" feature...

 

Syndicate content