Teacher Tools


One of the most common questions that teachers ask me about using Web 2.0 tools in teaching is, "How do you assess the work that your students produce in the different digital projects that they are involved in?" 

My first response is always, "Why do we have to assess everything?!  Can't there ever just be opportunities to create, collaborate and communicate for creation, collaboration or communication's sake?"

Then, I return to the real world---where assessment is the first step towards credibility---and work up grading opportunities that are student-centered, meaningful, and tailored for the unique skills emphasized by each tool that I use in my classroom. 

My first stab at assessing digital work started with wikis, where I use this set of criteria to rate the work my students produce.  When assessing blog work, I've chosen to use the ideas of Konrad Glogowski---who writes over at the Blog for Proximal Development and has developed this method for engaging students in reflective thought about their blogging efforts.   

Recently, I've tinkered with a system to assess my students' participation in Voicethread conversations.  Essentially mirroring the reflective aspects of Konrad's blogging handouts, I've decided to ask my students the following four questions while we're working with a new Voicethread:

  • Highlight a comment from our Voicethread conversation that closely matches your own thinking.   Why does this comment resonate---or make sense to---you?
  • Highlight a comment from our Voicethread conversation that you respectfully disagree with.  If you were to engage in a conversation with the commenter, what evidence/argument would you use to persuade them to change their point of view?
  • Highlight a comment from our Voicethread conversation that challenged your thinking in a good way and/or made you rethink one of your original ideas.  What about the new comment was challenging?  What are you going to do now that your original belief was challenged?  Will you change yoru mind?  Will you do more researching/thinking/talking with others?
  • <!--
    /* Font Definitions */
    @font-face
    {font-family:"Cambria Math";
    panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
    mso-font-charset:0;
    mso-generic-font-family:roman;
    mso-font-pitch:variable;
    mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1107304683 0 0 159 0;}
    @font-face
    {font-family:Calibri;
    panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;
    mso-font-charset:0;
    mso-generic-font-family:swiss;
    mso-font-pitch:variable;
    mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1073750139 0 0 159 0;}
    /* Style Definitions */
    p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
    {mso-style-unhide:no;
    mso-style-qformat:yes;
    mso-style-parent:"";
    margin:0in;
    margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:11.0pt;
    font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
    mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
    .MsoChpDefault
    {mso-style-type:export-only;
    mso-default-props:yes;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
    mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;}
    @page Section1
    {size:8.5in 11.0in;
    margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;
    mso-header-margin:.5in;
    mso-footer-margin:.5in;
    mso-paper-source:0;}
    div.Section1
    {page:Section1;}
    -->

  • <!--
    /* Font Definitions */
    @font-face
    {font-family:"Cambria Math";
    panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
    mso-font-charset:0;
    mso-generic-font-family:roman;
    mso-font-pitch:variable;
    mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1107304683 0 0 159 0;}
    @font-face
    {font-family:Calibri;
    panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;
    mso-font-charset:0;
    mso-generic-font-family:swiss;
    mso-font-pitch:variable;
    mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1073750139 0 0 159 0;}
    /* Style Definitions */
    p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
    {mso-style-unhide:no;
    mso-style-qformat:yes;
    mso-style-parent:"";
    margin:0in;
    margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:11.0pt;
    font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
    mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
    .MsoChpDefault
    {mso-style-type:export-only;
    mso-default-props:yes;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
    mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;}
    @page Section1
    {size:8.5in 11.0in;
    margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;
    mso-header-margin:.5in;
    mso-footer-margin:.5in;
    mso-paper-source:0;}
    div.Section1
    {page:Section1;}
    -->

  • <!--
    /* Font Definitions */
    @font-face
    {font-family:"Cambria Math";
    panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
    mso-font-charset:0;
    mso-generic-font-family:roman;
    mso-font-pitch:variable;
    mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1107304683 0 0 159 0;}
    @font-face
    {font-family:Calibri;
    panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;
    mso-font-charset:0;
    mso-generic-font-family:swiss;
    mso-font-pitch:variable;
    mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1073750139 0 0 159 0;}
    /* Style Definitions */
    p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
    {mso-style-unhide:no;
    mso-style-qformat:yes;
    mso-style-parent:"";
    margin:0in;
    margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:11.0pt;
    font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
    mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
    .MsoChpDefault
    {mso-style-type:export-only;
    mso-default-props:yes;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
    mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;}
    @page Section1
    {size:8.5in 11.0in;
    margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;
    mso-header-margin:.5in;
    mso-footer-margin:.5in;
    mso-paper-source:0;}
    div.Section1
    {page:Section1;}
    -->
  • <!--
    /* Font Definitions */
    @font-face
    {font-family:"Cambria Math";
    panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
    mso-font-charset:0;
    mso-generic-font-family:roman;
    mso-font-pitch:variable;
    mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1107304683 0 0 159 0;}
    @font-face
    {font-family:Calibri;
    panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;
    mso-font-charset:0;
    mso-generic-font-family:swiss;
    mso-font-pitch:variable;
    mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1073750139 0 0 159 0;}
    /* Style Definitions */
    p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
    {mso-style-unhide:no;
    mso-style-qformat:yes;
    mso-style-parent:"";
    margin:0in;
    margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:11.0pt;
    font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
    mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
    .MsoChpDefault
    {mso-style-type:export-only;
    mso-default-props:yes;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
    mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;}
    @page Section1
    {size:8.5in 11.0in;
    margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;
    mso-header-margin:.5in;
    mso-footer-margin:.5in;
    mso-paper-source:0;}
    div.Section1
    {page:Section1;}
    -->

  • Highlight the strand of
    conversation from our Voicethread conversation that was the most interesting or
    motivating to you. Which ideas would you
    like to have more time to talk about? Why? What new topics does this
    conversation make you want to study next?

Download VT_Scoring.doc

The cool part about assessing Voicethread presentations this way is that each question essenitally forces my students to interact with our conversation in a really meaningful way.  To craft careful answers, they must truly consider the comments of others---an essential skill for promoting collaborative versus competitive dialogue---and compare those comments against their own beliefs and preconceived notions. 

That's metacognition at its best!

What's even better is that when students know that these questions form the basis of our Voicethread assessment from the beginning of a conversation, participation level rise remarkably.  While students are looking for project reflection comments, they often end up highly motivated to share their thinking with peers. 

Whaddya' think?

(Image credit:  Speak Out by Chris Schuepp, licensed Creative Commons:  Attribution)

Scott McLeod---the mind behind Dangerously Irrelevant---has started an interesting July 4th tradition designed to support the digital development of school administrators called Leadership Day.  To participate, Scott asks interested edubloggers to:

Blog about whatever you like
related to effective school technology leadership: successes,
challenges, reflections, needs. Write a letter to the administrators in
your area. Post a top ten list. Make a podcast or a video. Highlight a
local success or challenge. Recommend some readings. Do an interview of
a successful technology leader. Respond to some of the questions below
or make up your own.

Having had my own learning permanently changed by digital tools over the past few years, I can't imagine a more important project to get involved in.  I passionately believe that digital tools make learning easy for everyone---and that by failing to integrate them into our practice, we are leaving our children unprepared to grow as self-directed thinkers and at a competitive disadvantage in a knowledge-based society.   

Heavy stuff, huh?

What's most frightening, though, is that I just plain doubt the digital capacity of most educators.  Many have yet to master efficient learning in the 21st Century---and some struggle to even seem interested in change! 

Now, it's difficult to argue that the mental stagnation surrounding schools is completely our fault.  Anyone who has worked in education for any length of time knows that
adult learning has generally been pushed aside
as we sprint through
days in a state of panic about leaving no child behind. 

The few moments that we can steal for professional development
(typically beginning and ending in July OR starting at 3:45 after we've
wrestled with kids for eight hours
) are spent in sessions with
"experts" pitching the latest silver bullet.  We rarely get to self-select learning opportunities, pursue professional passions, or engage in meaningful, ongoing conversations about instruction. 

We end up jaded, literally groaning
when given "opportunities to learn."
 

How's that for ironic!

Heck, even Richard Elmore---Professor of Educational Leadership at Harvard and all-around educational policy rock star---has gone as far as to argue that school structures make learning for adults unlikely at best and nothing short of impossible at worse:

It would be difficult to invent a more dysfunctional organization
for a performance-based accountability system. In fact, the existing
structure and culture of schools seems better designed to resist
learning and improvement than to enable it.

As expectations for
increased student performance mount and the measurement and publication
of evidence about performance becomes part of the public discourse
about schools, there are few portals through which new knowledge about
teaching and learning can enter schools;

few structures or processes in
which teachers and administrators can assimilate, adapt and polish new
ideas and practices; and few sources of assistance for those who are
struggling to understand the connection between the academic
performance of their students and the practices in which they engage.

So
the brutal irony of our present circumstance is that schools are
hostile and inhospitable places for learning. They are hostile to the
learning of adults and, because of this, they are necessarily hostile
to the learning of students.

Amazing, huh? 

To argue that schools are hostile to learning is a bold statement---but if you're a school leader, chances are good that you were nodding your head in agreement as you read through Elmore's thoughts. 

Times have changed in two significant ways, however, since Elmore began describing the hostile learning environments that have held schools back.  First, a new emphasis has been placed on the importance of collaborative learning between members of close-knit teams in schools

Second, digital tools now provide new "portals through which new knowledge about
teaching and learning can enter schools."

Specifically, thousands of accomplished educators are now writing blogs about teaching and learning, bringing transparency to both the art and the science of their practice.  Coming from every content area, grade level, school size and geographical region, they are actively reflecting on instruction, challenging assumptions, questioning policies, offering advice, designing solutions, and learning together. 

And all of this collective knowledge and professional challenge is readily available to your faculty for free!

Not a bad deal, huh? 

With the investment of a bit of time and effort, you can expose your teachers to more interesting ideas in one day than you've been able to expose them to in the past ten years of high-dollar professional development!  Better yet, this learning has the potential to be authentic---driven by personal interests and connected to classroom realities. 

All that you need to do is introduce RSS feed readers to your faculty!

Feed readers are probably the most important digital tool for today's learner because they make sifting through the amazing amount of content added to the Internet easy.  Also known as aggregators, feed readers are free tools that can automatically check nearly any website for new content dozens of times a day---saving ridiculous amounts of time and customizing learning experiences for anyone. 

Imagine never having to go hunting for new information from your favorite sources again.  Learning goes from a frustrating search through thousands of marginal links written by questionable characters to quickly browsing the thoughts of writers that you trust and respect.

Sounds too good to be true, doesn't it?

It's not!  Here's a Commoncraft tutorial explaining RSS Feeds in Plain English:

Have I hooked you yet?  If so, then it's time to take action!  To get your faculty learning again, take the following 10 steps:

  1. Start by using a feed reader as a learning tool for a few weeks yourself.  If you're really brave, find a collection of blogs that target school administrators and organize them on your own with an aggregator of your choice.  If you're not quite sure where to begin, try this collection of educational leadership blogs that my buddy Adam Garry and I organized with our favorite feed reader
  2. Dedicate a few minutes each day to browsing the content in your aggregator.  Notice how new posts are added automatically.  Make a commitment to reading two or three entries a week.  Find topics that you're motivated by and let your thinking be challenged.  Leave comments for the authors and see whether or not they respond.  Engage other readers in conversations or friendly debate. 
  3. Remember that all of this learning is completely free! 
  4. Smile profusely. 
  5. Tell others how much you enjoy having your thinking challenged by the blogs you are reading.  Share a few posts that you find with peers.  Ramble on about the beauty of RSS.  Use your enthusiasm to generate a buzz about the potential for professional learning to be fun again.
  6. If you're really brave, use a feed reader to create a collection of blogs for your teachers to explore.  Remember to find writers from different content areas and grade levels.  Focus on writers that offer specific, practical advice or model the kind of reflective thinking that you'd like to see more frequently in your building. 
  7. If you're not sure where to begin, use my personal feed reader.  I read the blogs in this collection all the time.  Some leave me challenged.  Some leave me angry.  Some leave me jazzed.  All leave me energized and ready to learn more.   
  8. Ask your teachers to share the most interesting articles that they find with you.  Read what they're sending and then extend conversations every chance that you get!  Make it a point to talk with a teacher about a shared blog post at least twice a week. 
  9. Remember that all of this learning is completely free.
  10. Smile profusely! 

Over time, you'll start to see a real change in the quality of the conversations in your faculty workroom.  No longer will teachers be sharing war stories or groaning about students.  Instead, they'll be debating the merits of the new instructional practices or the challenging ideas that they've stumbled across online. 

Better yet, you'll start to see RSS feeds finding their way into classroom instruction as well.  Teachers, driven to show others how to learn, will begin creating collections of student blogs for their kids to explore or designing automatically updating pages of resources on topics connected to their curriculum

To put it simply, you will have used a free digital tool to make individualized learning a part of the very fabric of your organization!

Shouldn't that be the ultimate goal of every school leader?

(Image credit:  Computer by Guillermo Esteves, licensed Creative Commons:  Attribution)


Scott McLeod---the brains behind Dangerously Irrelevant---wrote an interesting post recently titled Ed Tech Quarantine.  In it, Scott argues that educational technology groupies often chase new teachers away from technology with our digital giddiness. 

He writes:

One of the most common
refrains heard from teachers or administrators who listen to us talk or blog
about all of these new cool tools is “Why do I care about this as an
educator?
” In our eagerness to share our nearly-palpable glee and
excitement, we often struggle to adequately answer the “So what?” question in
ways that are substantive and meaningful to the average teacher or
administrator.

Scott goes on to propose a plan that he believes might make introducing educational technology to teachers easier that includes extensive piloting and perfection of classroom applications of new tools before advocacy with others begins.  He writes:

I believe that an emphasis on pilot testing, experimentation, and
identification of both mainstream educator use(s) and optimal training
mechanisms before introduction to other educators
often would help us quite a bit. Instead of turning off the very educators that
we want using many of these tools, some time spent in the ed tech
quarantine
might go a long way toward facilitating our overall
goal of greater technology adoption in K-12 classrooms.

Scott's ideas definitely ring true to me, primarily because I live on the digital edge and I've seen time and again how my acceptance of new digital tools actually chases my peers away!  They truly believe that I'm an odd bird who knows things about technology that they couldn't possibly know---so the tools that I embrace must automatically be beyond their own comfort and ability level

In that sense, I'm not particularly influential when it comes to pushing new uses for instructional technologies because I just don't look like the average teacher! 

Now, I'm also savvy enough to recognize the impact that I'm having on my peers---and I realized long ago that to be influential, I was going to have to do a bit of work on the digital dark-side.  So when pushing instructional technologies, I seek out progressive teachers that are seen as the electronic equals of their peers and work to introduce them to new applications for tools that can help to facilitate collaborative work with colleagues. 

Yup.  You read that right.  In my early conversations with teachers, I actually try to AVOID classroom uses of new tools!  While my ultimate goal is to see instruction change in classrooms because of digital tools, I'm also a full-time classroom teacher.  I know full well that changing instruction is an incredibly time-consuming process---and time is the resource that teachers just plain don't have enough of in our schools.

Instead, my singular focus is to show teachers how
to use new digital tools to save time or add value to their
professional lives.  I start with things like shared bookmarking between members of a
learning team
to reduce cross-team email and to make resource sharing fluent and easy.  I also introduce tools like Google Docs to create
shared lesson plans and team documents
.

Here's the handout that I use when putting the sell-job on faculties.  It lists several possible "first-steps" that teachers can take to begin exploring digital tools:

Download Handout_Choices_Web.doc

Notice how the tasks listed across the top of the web (where teachers are likely to look first) are all oriented towards facilitating collaboration and professional learning?  These are tasks that teachers are already responsible for and consumed by. 

If I can show teachers how to use digital tools to make this work easier, I'm sure to find an ally or two, aren't I?

Sometimes I feel guilty about my approach because it doesn't
immediately result in more student-centered instructional practices.
Teachers continue teaching in the same way they've always taught.

But the way I see it, teachers' number one concern is always
time
---so if they can see value in digital tools as professional time
savers, they'll be more likely to embed those tools completely into
their own lives.  And once those tools become a natural part of their daily work
and learning patterns, they're more likely to incorporate them into
their instruction.

Here's an example:

I've got a buddy who tells me about twice a week that he couldn't
live without the feed reader I helped him to set up because it helps him to find current event
titles that he uses in daily instruction
.  He's also jazzed because he's stumbled upon a collection of blogs by
librarians that are pushing his professional growth and knowledge of
his content area.

Now, he's yet to try to introduce RSS feeds to students at all---and
he's not using blogs in class either. His instruction has remained
largely unchanged.  But I believe that with time, he's likely to start to show his
students how RSS feeds can change their own learning too---simply
because it's so important to his own growth.

Does this make sense to you?

I guess what I'm wrestling with is should we even focus on the
instructional applications of digital tools when working with peers who've yet to dive into the digital waters?

Can we trust that a person who has their own learning and work
patterns changed by digital tools will naturally translate those new
patterns into their classrooms?

Is the trickle-down theory of digital professional development that I've been pushing productive?

Bill, who is saddened by the destruction of a digital generation.

(Image credit:  IMG_0982 by Karen Castens, licensed Creative Commons:  Attribution)

Alright, Radical readers---I need a bit of digital help! 

I've got a good friend who moved on to become one of the best principal professional developers that I know.  His current project is designed to try to help school leaders understand that the kinds of leadership traits and behaviors that support new teachers are not always the same as the kinds of leadership traits and behaviors that support experienced teachers.

Basically, he's hoping to get principals to differentiate a bit---and that's not a bad thing at all!

The only hitch is that he needs to begin collecting a bit of anecdotal data from real live practicing educators---which is why he contacted me!  Knowing that I'm still in the classroom, he figured I could convince a few of my practitioner buddies to fill out a short, five question survey detailing the kinds of working conditions that either keep them in---or drive them away from---the buildings where they work.

Now, you know me:  I'm a digital junkie, so I immediately saw this as a way to experiment with one of my favorite new tools----the form feature of Google Docs.  I took his survey and whipped it into a neat little form that you can fill out here:

School Leadership Survey

It'll take you anywhere from five minutes to five hours depending on how thoughtful you are---or how much you like/dislike your current teaching situation! 

The best part is that once you hit "Submit," your answers will automatically be added to a spreadsheet for me.  Just like that, I'll have a growing collection of answers that paint a picture for principals about the kind of working conditions that matter to teachers from all points on the teaching spectrum. 

What do you get out of all of this?

Well, if my undying love isn't enough, I'll promise to write a blog post in the near future explaining how you, too, can create forms using Google Docs.  It's a pretty nifty little feature that has about a thousand applications for classroom teachers.

And feel free to email this post along to every teacher that you know!  The more replies we get, the better our chances are of influencing the principals who are leading our schools.

(Image credit:  Help Point by Mark Hillary , licensed Creative Commons:  Attribution)


I've been doing a lot of thinking about wikis lately, primarily because they're probably the easiest Web 2.0 tool for teachers to begin using.

Sometimes I'm blown away by the fact that wikis are free!  After all, I think I've got about five or six different wikis cooking right now. 

I'm using this wiki to create daily current event reading lessons with a few colleagues on my hallway, this one to house the materials that I put together for presentations on using digital tools in the classroom, and this one to house the materials that a buddy of mine and I have put together for presentations on professional learning communities. 

I've also done a bunch of work with wikis in my classroom---and I'm not sure that I've hit the motherload there yet.  I did stumble across this pretty incredible wiki recently—and I'm planning on trying to use it as a model with my own students someday. 

As I look at more and more wikis being created by students, I think the following four traits is what defines "wiki goodness" to me:

Accurate Content:  The initial fear that every teacher has when approaching work with wikis is the constant risk that students will learn to embrace a tool that may just promote the sharing of inaccurate content.  With the much-publicized horror stories of false information appearing on major wiki sites like Wikipedia, we've become hesitant to embrace wikis as a teaching tool.

And in some ways, these fears are justified.  Because wikis are open websites that can be edited by anyone at any time, content on wikis is often changing—and at any given time, wikis can contain information that is just plain wrong.

But in many ways, that risk is what makes wikis such a valuable teaching tool!  The most accomplished wiki-educators don't shy away from inaccurate content posted on classroom wiki projects.  Instead, they embrace it as an opportunity to teach students about the importance of judging the reliability of online sources. 

While they are constantly pushing students to proofread their work for accuracy—and while they value accuracy in the products that are produced by their students—they also recognize that content errors are new opportunities to teach students about information literacy. 

Deep Linking:  Higher level learning experiences require learners to read and react to information.  Synthesizing and evaluating content created by others is essential before new understandings can be developed. 

In wiki work, evidence of this synthesis and evaluation can be seen in the number and quality of resources linked to on a wiki page.  As new content is developed, links from a variety of reliable resources are inserted to provide evidence that supports the thinking of the authors. 

Deep linking forces students to make connections between their own beliefs and external evidence.  It also serves as an additional opportunity for classrooms to have conversations about judging the reliability of online sources.  Wiki pages with extensive links to credible sources are more likely to be trustworthy than those with limited links to questionable sources. 

Evidence of Group Revision:  Wikis are designed for collaboration, plain and simple.  They are tools that facilitate the asynchronous work of groups around content that is of shared interest.  As a result, accomplished academic wiki pages have evidence of extensive group revision. 

Page discussion boards include ongoing conversations about quality and content—and a careful exploration of the page history button (generally found somewhere in the header or footer of each wiki page) will reveal an extensive collection of previous versions.

In many ways, group revision is the greatest challenge for teachers interested in incorporating wiki work into their classrooms because students are inherently tentative about making meaningful edits to one another's work.  Used to the traditional isolation of the American classroom—where collaboration has generally been somewhat simple or superficial—peers generally use wiki pages as places to post their own content, rather than to make changes to content posted by others. 

Over time and with constant modeling, however, students embrace the collective nature of wiki pages and begin to make meaningful revisions to the work of their peers. 

Quality Presentation:  Accomplished wikis are really no different from accomplished writing in any other format:  They demonstrate the use of age appropriate grammar, punctuation and spelling.  Writers recognize that effective communication depends on their ability to create pieces that are easy to understand and unencumbered by mistakes.

For many teachers, wikis become natural forums for reviewing grammar and spelling rules with students!  Because errors are almost always going to be present in constantly changing work being created by kids, wikis are built-in, real world opportunities for proofreading practice.   

Accomplished wikis also demonstrate age-appropriate levels of visual presentation.  Images and embedded video are often used to enhance wiki pages.  Creators maintain a balance, however, between appropriate use of multimedia content and digital overkill, recognizing that interactive elements can distract readers.

Do these categories make any sense to you?  Am I leaving anything out in my quest for wiki-nirvana? 

I kind of feel like this is my own quest for the Holy Grail!

(Image credit:  DSC_6157 by JPKWitter, licensed Creative Commons:  Attribution)

Not long ago, a reader named Fred left the following question for the TLN blog team: 

I've been reading with interest many of the discussions about the 21st century classroom.  A question about student blogging-  how much emphasis should be put on maintaining a higher level of spelling and grammar while still encouraging students to be active users of the blog?  Is there a declining need for correctness as long as the ideas flow? 

We are going to be working in a 21st century classroom environment in four of our classrooms at a high school level next year as a result of a Title II-D grant, and I need to start looking at how we are going to use blogging as the effective tool it can be.  I will have to sell our school board as right now most blogging is blocked. 

Great questions, Fred----dozens of educators are wrestling with the same issues, that's for sure.  Blogging certainly seems---based on the wave of teachers jumping into the digital soup---to be a logical step, but having a practical plan in place before introducing blogs to your students will definitely make your efforts more targeted and productive.

Before I tackle your specific question, please know that I've started organizing all of the resources that I've created on digital tools in the classroom in this wiki.  Poke around in it a bit and you might find materials that are valuable in your work.  I've got developing pages on blogs, wikis and Voicethread presentations at this point---and have plans to create pages on social bookmarking and instant messaging in the near future.

I'd also encourage you to remember that blogs are nothing more than tools that can facilitate learning experiences and help teachers to address pre-defined curricular goals.  It's sometimes amazing to me to see the number of teachers who engage students in "blogging for blogging's sake," figuring that because "21st Century Learning" is all the rage right now, any attempts to incorporate digital creation into the classroom makes sense, regardless of outcomes.   

Instead of falling into this all-too-common trap, decide what exactly it is that you want students to accomplish with a blogging project before you even begin.  By doing so, you can properly gauge the "need for correct-ness" in student entries.   

For me, classroom blogging began as a way to get my students to make their thinking transparent for a wider audience, allowing others to read, respond and challenge contentions or pre-existing notions.  Specifically, our blog became a place of reflection and debate about the themes behind the current events that form the foundation of our study of Europe and South America. 

We regularly tackle issues ranging from poverty and social justice to hatred and tyranny----and we're always trying to engage our readers in conversations about both sides of every issue that we study.

What's most important is that these efforts fit into a broader plan to teach children to express ideas through writing---a skill directly connected to the Standard Course of Study I'm charged with delivering.  Consider the opening statement in our sixth grade curriculum guide, which reads:

Sixth grade students use oral language, written language, and media and technology for expressive, informational, argumentative, critical, and literary purposes. Students also explore the structure of language and study grammatical rules in order to speak and write effectively. While emphasis in sixth grade is placed on personal expression, students also:

  • Interpret and synthesize information.
  • Develop an understanding of the foundations of argument.
  • Critically analyze print and non-print communication.
  • Use effective sentence construction and edit for improvements in sentence formation, usage, mechanics, and spelling.
  • Interpret and evaluate a wide range of literature

Notice the emphasis on understanding the foundations of argument and the use of effective sentence structure and grammar.  Because those skills are expected outcomes for my sixth grade writers, I push students to proofread everything that they write for our blog carefully---ranting about errors in structure or spelling that make understanding inefficient for readers. 

"You can't be influential," I regularly push, "unless your ideas are communicated in a clear and accurate manner.  Every error cheapens who you are---and cheapens the value of your argument in the eyes of those who've stumbled upon what you have written." 

I think the key to my success with blogging rests in the fact that I started with a clear end in mind:  To give students a forum for articulation and argument.  That end has guided every decision that I've made about our digital work---including my emphasis on entries that are well written and proofread carefully.

Once you've decided on the ultimate purpose for your blogging projects, your implementation and assessment decisions will be easy---and you'll likely be more convincing with the decision makers who have blocked blogs in your district!  Imagine walking in to a meeting with a list of specific objectives that you intend to address through blogging. 

It would be difficult at best for school leaders to deny access to free tools that can help you to meet the objectives that they have set for you, wouldn't it?  At the very least, you'd be more convincing than ever before!

John---another regular Radical reader---also asked a question about blogging recently in response to a collection of statistics from a survey of my students that I shared:

Bill -- I see in various places that K12 students are much less engaged in blogging than adults, and generally don't rate blogs high on their list of favorite web tools. Do you think that your emphasis on blogging in your classes, and the success of the Blurb on the Web, has "skewed" your students' views about blogs?

And if so, what are some tips you have for teachers to build interest in blogs among their students?

I think the biggest tip that I'd have for classroom teachers interested in building interest in blogging among their students would be to see blogging as something more than just a place for students to post stand-alone thoughts. 

For me, the power in blogging rests not in what I write alone, but in the reactions that others have to my writing and in my efforts to read and respond to the thoughts of others.  Some people mistake blogs as digital soapboxes---places to stand and deliver individual viewpoints, regardless of what other people think. 

Those people end up quickly becoming lonely bloggers!

Accomplished bloggers seek out others who are wrestling with common areas of interest, primarily because opportunities to interact with ideas is motivating.  One of the tenets of constructivism is that true learning only takes place when deeply held personal beliefs are challenged by contrary evidence.  In those moments, individuals are forced to refine and revise ideas that they once held to be true. 

In a sense, blogging makes such experiences possible for everyone.  It is, in some ways, a remarkable opportunity for differentiation because writers of all ages are wrestling with interesting ideas at all times.  With a bit of poking around, challenging content can be found for anyone.

What makes this search for a network of like minded bloggers even more powerful in a school setting is that all middle and high schoolers really care about are connections, right?  Today's kids are naturally networked to begin with!  Why else would teachers spend half of our days shooing kids out of the hallways in between classes and fussing about never ending text messages sent from hundreds of hands hidden beneath desks each period?

As Jeff Utecht brilliantly explained in his Sustainable Blogging session for the 2007 K-12 Online conference, the best blogging efforts begin when teachers work to embrace the collective nature of the teen mind.  Highly motivated student bloggers see themselves as a part of a larger group of students that are reading and writing about powerful ideas together. 

That "larger group" may contain peers that live two doors down or two continents away---location is irrelevant, really.  All that matters is that your kids become regular readers of blogs being created---and regularly updated---by others with similar interests.

Whenever I doubt the important role that social networking plays in student learning, I remind myself of the kinds of comments that my students leave in every survey that I give them about digital tools.  My current favorites come from students thinking about Voicethread---a tool that, like blogging, provides students with opportunities to think together about ideas: 

    • "I really enjoy Voicethread because it's a cool way to have a digi- conversation with people from your class, or other web surfers invited to view it. Several new ideas that I wouldn't have thought of bounce around my head after I visit. It's something new everyday."
    • "Voicethread is a cool way to interact! I'm proud to say that several amazing comments fill the pages and they're written by bright students in our class."
    • "Voicethread allows me to hear the thoughts of many other students just like me! I can think differently about the same topic, and people really do challenge my mind. I also like to respond to people and challenge their thinking and share the way I think with them."

Notice the role that connective thinking plays in student motivation.  Each of these kids is driven by something more than publishing their own work for the world to see.  They're driven by interactions---the sense that their ideas are a part of a larger conversation that matters.      

So how do you make that happen in your classroom blogging projects?

Begin by using a feed reader to create a collection of age-appropriate blogs for your students to follow.  Here's the collection that I've assembled for my students.  Over time, your students will find favorite bloggers and begin to discover ideas that challenge their own thinking. 

Then, encourage your students to begin leaving comments for other bloggers.  Commenting is a quick and easy way to get kids writing and reflecting---and it builds a sense of community between readers and writers.  Each time that a student in your class responds to the thinking of a digital peer, they are building relationships based on thought and intellectual interactions with other bloggers---who are likely to reciprocate.

You'll need to teach your kids some strategies for leaving good comments, however.  All too often, early comments left by kids aren't terribly meaningful because no one ever bothers to explain to students that commenting is a powerful form of reflection----or that the thinking of authors can be directly challenged by readers!  In some ways, breaking children of the "author-awe" they've learned since they picked up their first books in preschool is one of the greatest challenges of creating well-rounded student bloggers.   

I've spent some time trying to teach my students to leave good comments over the course of the past school year.  The tips in this post---written earlier this year for a digital project that my class completed with a sister class in Washington, DC---might be a helpful starting point when working with your students.       

Finally, encourage your kids to expand on their comments and respond to other writers in new posts for their personal blogs----much like I'm doing here with you!  By doing so, student bloggers find connections between their own thinking and the thinking of others.  Blog entries become much more than "just another writing assignment."  Instead, they become a part of an ongoing conversation between peers----and nothing drives kids more than conversations with peers.

Do any of these ideas make sense? 

For readers that are actively blogging with students, what have I left out?      

(Image credit:  Lights by Michael Casey, licensed FREE USE!)

Syndicate content