School and Community

I have been teaching long enough now that I have the pleasure of watching some of my former students become my colleagues. One of them is Maxwell, a young man now in his early thirties whom  I have known since he was a ninth grader.  Thoughtful, respectful, and intelligent, Maxwell has always leaned toward public service.  He was raised in a foster home by a loving, elderly couple, and after their deaths, helped to raise his two younger sisters. After graduating from college with honors, he served two tours in Iraq; then the married father of two boys decided he wanted to be a teacher and a role model to other Black young men.

Max has taught history at several high schools, and is highly respected by co-workers and students. For those who care about numbers, every year that he has taught, 95% of Max’s students have succeeded on the state’s history exit exam (with the exception of one year when the average slipped to 87%).  Like so many of us, Max spends large amounts of his personal time and money on his students.  He prepares lessons weeks in advance, constantly reflects and monitors his own work, pursues his own professional development, and volunteers for extra duties at the school, all without additional compensation.

You would think he’d be a poster for the future of teaching: a successful, minority male teacher who cares about his students and whose students perform well academically. You’d think his school administrators would be thrilled to have him on their staff and support his efforts.

Think again.

Max, who is also a deacon in our church, sat with me after service recently and explained why he has decided to look for other career options.  I had followed the saga over the last year and a half since his school changed principals (again) and had been put under state receivership because of administrative/financial mismanagement issues and low student performance (obviously, not Max’s students).  The new principal, a transfer from an elementary school in another district, is according to the teachers, “weak” in dealing with high school students or administrative issues.  The tipping point for Max, however, has been the state-appointed consultant who has been given carte blanche to evaluate and dictate teaching practice to all faculty--including those who don’t need such micromanaging.  

“It’s like everything I do or want to do now is unacceptable,” he told me, almost in tears. “I just can’t take it anymore.” He has been threatened by his new principal with firing on the grounds of insubordination (we are a right -to-work state), unless he stops disagreeing with the consultant and simply “does what he is told.” Being fired on those grounds would also put his teaching license in jeopardy.

This particular situation carries heavy racial overtones: the consultant is a white woman, with limited teaching experience herself, and none teaching African American students. What she does have is a lot of educational theory, a laundry list of generic best practices, and authority from the district leadership to tell every teacher what and how to teach, even in subjects for which she has no pedagogical background.  If this were just one consultant in one school causing problems for one highly effective teacher, the situation could be salvageable, and so might Maxwell’s career.  Unfortunately, similar scenes are being played out in predominantly Black and poor schools all across the Delta, and the nation.    

Maxwell, like many of my young Black students, wants to remain here in the Delta, where he is needed.  The Mississippi Delta has been an area of chronic teacher shortage for over 25 years, and growing our own teachers is clearly the best long-term solution to that problem.  Yet, it is some of our best, Black teachers who have been targeted by would-be reformers as problems that need to be whipped into line or pushed out of our schools.  Another of my students has become principal of what was a struggling school, whose students face many economic and social obstacles. The elementary school has met or exceeded its learning goals each year of her principalship, yet the district instead of rewarding and supporting her work, has cut the school’s funding more than other lower performing ones in the district. The district also, without input from parents, re-shuffled student school assignments so that the school’s highest performing students were moved to other schools.

The stress of wanting to continue doing what Max believes is his professional best for his students but being prevented, even forbidden, from doing so has taken its toll on this diligent young teacher.  He told me he’s looking at a job with a textbook company or maybe taking an offer from a company looking for someone to do workforce training (both of which pay more than his classroom teaching job). Meanwhile, our schools continue to churn through temporary instructors from various alternative programs or long-term substitutes causing untold disruption and damage to the hopes and dreams of our children.

My heart breaks for Maxwell and the many other wonderful Black teachers like him who are being forced to make such unnecessary and harmful choices.  My heart breaks for the students whose education is being compromised and short-changed by administrative decisions that put self-promotion and preservation ahead of real student needs and potential.  But sadness and disgust, alone,  won’t change anything. We can’t say we want high quality teachers in every classroom, if we’re not going to allow them to do high quality teaching. Otherwise, a free, quality public education for every American child remains only a partially filled dream and an empty promise. I’m more determined than ever to continue fighting for teacher voice and teacher leadership in public education, and more important, encouraging the next generation of teachers to take up that fight. 

As with so many other issues in America today, there is dichotomous debate over whether using competition and market forces will improve education, versus increasing the collaboration and support in our existing public schools can produce the changes we seek....

What I liked most about this film is its painful honesty. It tears away at myth after myth in a time when misinformation about teaching and learning abounds.

My colleagues, members of the Teacher Leaders Network, and I have given the President's jobs plan mixed reviews. Generally, we felt the proposed bill is better than nothing, but not nearly enough.

It's the poverty of the school, not just of the students, that's keeping too many of our students from achieving at their highest potential.

Thanks to @SOSMarch for the tweet that led me to this wonderful message from the United Church of Christ giving a faith perspective on some of the most pressing issues in education today. Here's a slice: As people of faith...

Until we consistently produce true teacher- leaders, our working lives and conditions will remain at the whims those who don't pay the price or carry the responsibility of shaping children's lives.

Caperton and Henry Louis Gates, Jr. remind us of a dangerous and uncomfortable truth. Worth reading.

Gaston Caperton: The Educational Crisis of Young Men of Color

There is an education crisis facing young men of color. It's not on the front page of the newspaper. People aren't organizing on Facebook or Twitter. But it's out there, and if we fail to address this crisis together, the education level of the entire American workforce will decline for the first time in our history.

In his last speech, given the night before his death on April 4, 1968, Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. shared both his reason for being in Memphis, and his vision for the future.

He was there to support, in very tangible ways, the struggle of public workers against injustice and mistreatment. He argued, as he had during the pitched anti-segregation battle in Birmingham, that "injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."

Dr. King is part of a long line of Americans who believed and have held this country to its promise that 'All men are created equal, and are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness...." 

We honor his memory by standing up for the public workers across the country who are being slandered and deprived of their legitimate, hard-won rights. 

We come too far, to turn back now.

As a country, we value the education of some children more than we do that of others. And the kids know it.

When I was in junior high school in Detroit (long before its current meltdown), my classmates and I were taken out to the public high school of one of the wealthiest suburbs for an “exchange visit.”  We were stunned to see carpeted, well-stocked libraries, working restrooms with warm water and hand towels; real science laboratories; and a gym building with indoor track and swimming pool. We were never told what the purpose of the trip was, but its net effect was to confirm that we were worth—less than rich people’s children.

According to the recently released second part of the 2010 MetLife survey,  48% of students felt their teachers expectations of their academic performance matched their own. In fact, 38% of students, especially those who get lower grades in school, think their teachers have expectations that are too high. This is a significant improvement over the 2009 results in which the majority of students did not believe their teachers even wanted them to succeed.

Pair that result with another from the 2010 survey: That an even larger percentage of students at lower performing schools believe that their schools could be better at equipping them with the skills and abilities needed to succeed in college or careers. The students are perceptive enough to make the distinction between their teachers (those folks with the high expectations), and the school conditions in which they and their teachers must work and learn.  They recognize, as my classmates and I did, that the schools which serve them are of lower quality than those serving their suburban or cross-town peers.

The students and teachers who have the most to accomplish are historically and continually expected to do it with fewer resources than those who do not have an “achievement gap.”

My teachers and most of those with whom I have taught here in the Mississippi Delta have done amazing work under often disgraceful conditions. I wondered then and now, how much more they could have done if they had the resources and support of their better situated colleagues?  Shouldn’t ending this longstanding inequity be a top priority of education reform and ESEA reauthorization?

How can we seriously address determining which teachers are or are not effective when even the best teachers in poor schools are forced to work under conditions that limit both them and their students? How ironic is it that some of the same political forces that have planned and perpetuated this inequity are now among the loudest criers for giving poor parents the choice to send their children to other schools? How encouraging is it when parents and students recognize that it’s often not the teachers, but the lack of resources or political leadership that is putting their children at educational disadvantage.

Syndicate content