Education History

To some, it may have been just political showmanship, but what a show it was.

As I watched Barack Obama's acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention, I thought about how much this would have meant to my granparents, to my late father, and what it could mean for my children and grandchildren.

45 years ago, it was still just a dream.

I wish Emmett Till could have grown up to see this.

Addie Mae Collins, Denise McNair, Carole Robertson, and Cynthia Wesley (the four victims of the bombing of Birmingham's 16th Street Baptist Church in 1963) would have been about my age. I wish we could have watched this together.

Not that having Black elected officials has resolved the problems of the African American community, but having the opportunity to become an elected official and the highest one in the land, is a far cry from being counted 3/5 (or non)human.

Some say it's been an amazingly short period---a lifetime. Others, with a more historical view, think it's been an unbearably long time coming. Long or short, it is a powerful moment because even symbols matter. Sometimes, the symbols matter more than the reality because they can be used, for better or worse, to change reality.

I do know this: Something is very different in the faces and the attitudes of many of the young people around me, particularly the Black males. There is a level of energy and a hopefulness among them that I have not seen for almost 40 years.

And my soul is glad.

Here at the beginning of the school year (yes, here in the Deep South, school is back in session!), I revel in the annual excitement of the first days of school. Students and teachers alike are pumped and ready for this year to be different, better. However, I'm also experienced enough to know that in a very few days, that excitement is going to dissipate. For some, it will settle into a solid work ethic fueled by genuine desire to teach and learn. For others, it will crumble and corrode what could have been a great opportunity into a intolerable burden.

Particularly vexing to me: Why are so many Black students so indifferent or openly hostile towards their own education? (Warning: I'm going to repeat some things I've said before).

I once saw a photo in an old Life magazine  (circa 1955) of black students in South Africa under apartheid who, having no supplies, were using their fingernails and some old pins to cut out pictures to use in a learning activity in elementary school. Others were using their fingers in the dirt to write their lessons.

I thought about that photo on a recent visit to my mother's hometown, one of the only remaining settlements established by former slaves at the end of the Underground Railroad in Canada. In its prime, the school offered courses from Latin and Greek to vocational training. After the Civil War, some of its graduates returned to the U.S to help educate the newly freed slaves. So great was the reputation of the settlement school that it attracted blacks and whites from great distances.

Americans of African descent were the only group of people in the history of this country who were forbidden by law to read or write. It was punishable to be caught teaching Black people (slave or free) to read or even to give them a Bible. Yet the more it was denied them, the more Black people pursued education for ourselves and our children.

About five miles from where I now live is another town created by former slaves: Mound Bayou, Mississippi. With assistance from Booker T. Washington and the Tuskegee Institute, Isaiah T. Montgomery and his cousin Benjamin Green led a group of former slaves to develop a thriving community in the heart of cotton country. At its peak, Mound Bayou's 8,000 black citizens had a newspaper, bank, telephone system, railroad station, several businesses and industries, churches, and multiple schools. Like its Canadian counterpart, the quality of Mound Bayou's schools was legendary, producing generations of leaders and productive citizens. At one point, over 95% of the town's graduates went on to either college or the military.

A 1988 study of literacy here in the Mississippi Delta region focused on teachers and students at two traditionally Black high schools, one of which was in Mound Bayou.  The author was curious about the remarkable success rate of these students on the then-new state mandated test (Functional Literacy Exam) as compared to other students (Black and white) around the state.  By all statistical measures, the students in these two districts were "at-risk," yet they consistently performed well on standardized tests and had high graduation and college attendance rates.

What happened?

In an unexpected consequence of the Brown v. Board of Education decision, more than 38,000 of the 82,000 Black teachers across the South lost their jobs, as did over 90% of the Black principals when white-controlled school districts refused to hire them to teach in the newly desegregated (albeit unwillingly) schools.  This despite the fact that many of the Black educators were actually better trained than their white counterparts. The percentage of Black teachers in America has been on a steady decline ever since.

Although the segregated Black school suffered from lack of materials, space, and equipment, they relatively luxuriated in the control of their curriculum and teaching methods (relative, that is to many of today's Black schools both inner city and rural).  Within the bosom of the community, young African Americans learned not only language arts, including impeccable standard usage, but also the literature, stories, histories, ethics, songs, hopes, and expectations of our people as well as those of the nation at large.  This is not to romanticize the degrading realities of segregation or to suggest that all the teachers and methods of the past were excellent. But learning itself had a mission and reason; and that reason was much larger than "You need to learn this so you can pass the state test" or even "You need to get an education so you can get a job and make a lot of money."   

What I remember most about my own childhood and throughout my school years was the unrelenting encouragement from all the adults around me to "make something of myself" so I could contribute to the overall community. Too few of our children hear that message today; some never hear it; some infrequently.

We should reclaim our children and their future by reviving our commitment to the value of their education.

With a vigorous nod to my colleague, Susan Graham, for her insights over at Teacher Magazine on the recently issued "A Broader, Bolder Approach to Education" I offer a few additional thoughts.

On the surface, most of what the statement calls for is laudable and logical. But as I read it more closely, a few statements began to trouble me.

For example: "Education policy in this nation has typically been crafted around the expectation that schools alone can offset the full impact of low socioeconomic status in learning."  Oh, really? The children of the poor have been the primary concern of educational policymakers? And what is the evidence (or better yet, the results) of that concern?

I have long standing issues about "grade levels," and how they are determined, so I wonder about this emphasis on children coming to school equally prepared. "Every American child should arrive at the starting line of first grade ready and able to learn." Again, this sounds noble. But, to agree with that one has to buy in to the idea that all children should be able to do certain things by a certain age. Having raised 11 children and worked with thousands, that dog just won't hunt with me. I'm particularly leery of African American boys being mislabeled as non-verbal or having social or behavioral problems by pre-K and kindergarten teachers who are unable to connect with them culturally (sorry, that one was a grandbaby issue).  Whether or not children are "ready" for school depends largely on what it is we intend to do for them when they reach school.  Not having a home to sleep in before coming to school is an economic disadvantage; not liking or recognizing certain types of social customs is a cultural difference. Not everyone takes time to tell the difference.

I won't take time to go into it here, but the real history of the Head Start program, which began in rural Mississippi, is what I was thinking of when I read the statement's call for "increased investment in developmentally appropriate and high-quality early childhood, pre-school, and kindergarten education."  That kind of noble talk has been heard before, and it translated into the worst kind of paternalistic racist usurpation's of parental rights and community-based cultural practices.  It was well-intentioned educational policy during the desegregation of the schools that led to the dismissal of thousands of Black school administrators and highly effective teachers. Those same policies led to a dismantling of the cultural ties between communities (in our case Black communities) and our schools. These mostly unintended consequences were, nevertheless, debilitating. Collateral damage from poorly developed and implemented public education policy....Hmm...where have we seen that recently?

The same policy-making bodies that forced us, for example, to separate learning into discreet, unconnected bits of economically testable knowledge or to separate children into one-way developmental tracks, are now to be trusted to turn that around? Bold thinking for sure.

On another note, the statement's call for increased access to medical care by putting "full-service health clinics in schools" was enough to make me cry. Health clinics? The majority of schools here don't even have an occasional public health nurse visit. The shortage of nurses and medical personnel in our state is worse than the chronic teacher shortage, and affects the same high-need communities, urban and rural.  Overcrowded school buildings or trailers, some with outdated, even unsanitary conditions for students and teachers, would make curious, but certainly welcome settings for such full-service clinics.

All that said, however, I'm trying hard not to be cynical, just pragmatic. Making 'broader, bolder" statements is certainly much easier than making and implementing effective policy. But I'm glad there are those who haven't given up, and I'm glad to partner with them (paraphrasing John Wesley) to accomplish all the good we can, or at least, to learn from our past mistakes and not do more harm.

You owe it to yourself to read the recent blog by one of my favorite teacher-scholars, Gloria Ladson-Billings: 'A Letter to Our Next President' at The Forum for Education and Democracy.

She argues brilliantly that what we call the "achievement gap" might more accurately be described as an "education debt" that needs to be paid.The article outlines some of the historical threads that have created the current web of inequality in which so many of our public school students find themselves trapped.

Drawing from history, economics, politics, as well as pedagogy, Dr. Ladson-Billings paints this analogy:

"I liken the yearly exercise of constructing the federal budget to the notion of the achievement gap. Every year public schools publish the results of standardized test scores. At some schools we celebrate and say we have 'balanced the budget.' At other schools we bemoan the fact that the standardized test scores reveal we have produced yet another 'deficit budget.' Again, lurking behind this yearly exercise of producing achievement test scores is the education debt of longstanding inequities and educational disenfranchisement. I believe this debt is historical, economic, and moral."

I hope the next President (and the rest of us) are brave enough to face these truths and pay up.

Syndicate content