Bill Ferriter

Let's start with a simple truth, y'all: 
Student engagement matters. 

When kids care about the lessons that they
are learning, they are WAY more likely to master the kinds of essential
skills, content and behaviors that will help them to become productive,
contributing members of our society.

But the uncomfortable reality -- drawn from this January 2013 Gallup survey
of 500,ooo students in grades 5-12 -- is that the chances are REALLY
good that the majority the kids in YOUR classes AREN'T engaged:

(click to enlarge)



How can we legitimately defend the work that we are doing in schools -- and our status as professionals -- when over half of the kids that we serve report not being engaged in our classrooms?

Something's got to change -- and from the looks of this survey, it's our teaching.

#enoughsaid

_______________________

Related Radical Reads:

Technology Gives Kids Power

Digital Immigrants Unite

Introducing Our Newest Cause: #SUGARKILLS

A school principal buddy of mine who I'll keep nameless for the time being reached out yesterday looking for a bit of advice.

His
teachers are incredibly excited about the notion of becoming a
professional learning community, but he isn't sure exactly where to
start in order to lay the right foundation for the work that they want
to do together. 

He wrote:

"Not
sure what I am asking here… I guess I just feel that I have teachers
buying in now and I don't want to blow it… but I also don't want to have
the time in which the focus is on conversations rather than actual
doing.  I feel we have great conversations but these conversations don't
always lead to change.

As
we are just starting out in September, we have 3 more staff meetings
and a possible day in the summer to discuss/plan for PLC time next year.
 Should the focus be purpose, process (norms, etc) for this year and
the start of next year?

There
are so many resources at All Things PLC that I am a bit overwhelmed and
not sure where to look.  Beyond the Learning By Doing book, are there
other key resources you would recommend me checking out this year and in
the summer?"

As a guy who is pretty passionate about the power of professional learning communities, I get asked this question a bunch. 
While there are literally TONS of good resources for helping school
leaders to structure professional learning communities, finding
practical starting points can be tough simply because there is SO much
information to sift through.

Here are five resources from my own work that I think school leaders who are starting PLCs from scratch might find useful:

The Power of PLCs
- One challenge that many school leaders face when moving their schools
towards a more collaborative future is convincing teachers that PLCs
can be something more than just another initiative.  Those leaders might
find this post useful.  In it, I give a tangible example of how my own
practice changed as a result of an opportunity to collaborate with my
peers.

Don't Skip Vision and Values Statements
- On a more practical level, it is ESSENTIAL for school leaders to help
their faculties define a set of tangible action steps that will guide
the work of every learning team in their buildings.  In this post, I
explain why vision and values statements matter so much and share the
collective commitments and action steps that my school recently
developed.

What DO We Want Students to Know and Be Able to Do and Practice-Centered Observation Protocol
-  My buddy's primary concern is that the time his teachers spend
collaborating might not lead to any tangible change in practice.  That's
where these two handouts will come in handy.  Both are designed to help
teachers keep the collaborative work that they are doing focused on
student-learning.  They can serve as solid starting points for
meaningful conversations.

Laying the Collaborative Foundation
- In October of 2012, I spent a full day working with the Glenwood
Leadership Academy -- a progressive school in Evansville, Indiana that
was working to cement their collaborative foundation as well.  This link
connects to the workshop materials that I prepared for their school. 
It is designed to introduce teams and teachers to a set of tangible
first steps that schools can and should take in order to ensure that
their PLCs get off to a solid start.

Does any of this look useful to you?

You can find the rest of my PLC content by poking around in the PLC category of my blog or by exploring the handouts from my two PLC books:  Building a PLC at Work and Making Teamwork Meaningful.

Are there any resources that YOU would recommend to school leaders interested in setting up PLCs in their buildings? 

_____________________________

Related Radical Reads:

PLCs: Why This?  Why Now?  Why Bother?

Why This, Why Now, Why Bother - Part Deux

The Stages of PLC Development

One of the lessons that teachers working in digital spaces HAVE to
learn is that a complete reliance on any ONE digital tool and/or service
is a recipe for disaster.

This video by Erik Qualman explains why


The moral of the story is a simple one, isn't it? 
Technology is constantly improving and advancing and changing and
adapting -- which means those of us who rely on technology need to be
constantly improving and advancing and changing and adapting too.

Need an example from my life? 

I've spent the past few years madly in love with RSS feed readers -- simple tools that automatically check my favorite websites for new content and bring that content back to me.

My
RSS reader is LITERALLY the first place that I turn every time that I
want to learn something new simply because it makes me more efficient. 

Because my reader is automatically collecting new content from my
favorite sites, I know that every time I log in, I'm going to find
something that is interesting and professionally challenging -- even if I
only have five minutes to explore.

Here's the hitch, though:  The first RSS Reader that I fell in love with --- Pageflakes --- went out of business about two years after I started using it, and NOW the replacement service that I found -- Google Reader -- is being killed off in July of this year.

Talk
about frustrating!  I literally spent months tinkering with both
services -- figuring out just what they could do, customizing settings
so that they acted just the way that I wanted them to, and finding ways
to incorporate the lessons that I was learning into the work that I do
with teachers and with students.

And now I've got to
start all over again. I've got to find ANOTHER feed reader and
experiment with MORE settings and learn NEW lessons that I can share
with teachers.

But that's the nature of living in a digital world, y'all. We have to be digitally resilient.

We
have to understand that our lives are not over when our favorite tools
and/or services go belly up.  Instead, we need to see the death of
trusted tools as opportunities to experiment with something new -- and
quite probably, something better than we ever could have expected.

 Any of this make sense?

_____________________

Related Radical Reads:

New Slide - Digitally Resilient

Openly Sick of Being Digitally Resilient

Epic Tech Fail Day

Epic Tech Fail Day Summary

 

As some of you may know,
I started a new classroom blog with my students that is designed to
raise awareness in tweens and teens about the amount of sugar found in
the foods that they are eating.

It's called #SUGARKILLS.  Check it out:

http://sugarkills.us

So
far, the project has been a remarkable success.  We've literally posted
a new bit every school day for the past month -- and my students are
straight jazzed about the notion that THEY have the power to make a
difference in the world.

Need proof? 

Then check out this quote from a recent interview that we completed for Middleweb:

A couple weeks ago, Mrs. Swanson left us a comment
about how her dad has diabetes and our blog is really helping him.  It
makes us feel great to know that we’ve made a difference in someone’s
life.  

What
if Mrs. Swanson’s father made the decision to say “no” to one candy
bar, because of us?  Then he would keep making healthier choices, and
that could eventually save his life!  We would have made a huge
difference.

We’ve also discovered that other teachers are actually sharing our work
with their students, which makes us feel like we really matter to other
people.  How many 12 year old students can say that they are changing
people’s lives around the world?  

The fact that we can is amazing!

So how can YOU get a great student-driven blog up and running in YOUR classroom? 

Here are three of my favorite tips.

Tip 1:  Create ONE Topic-Focused Blog

A
lesson that I learned early in my work with blogs is that they are far
more vibrant -- and attract far more attention -- when they are updated
regularly.  The challenge for student bloggers, then, is generating
enough content to bring readers back for more.

The solution in my
classroom is to always START classroom blogging projects with ONE
classroom blog that EVERY student can make contributions to.  Doing so
takes the pressure of generating content off of individual students
simply because there are dozens of potential writers who are adding
content at any given time.

I also tend to create blogs that are
focused on a specific theme or topic rather than general blogs that
contain content across several domains and/or interest areas.  By
focusing my blogs on a specific theme connected to a cause that my kids
are passionate about, I can tap into the desire of students to "do work
that matters."

Tip 2: Train Student Editors to Lead Your Blogging Project

I'm
going to be honest with you:  Student blogging projects take a TON of
time and energy and effort.  Posts need to be written and revised and
edited.  Images need to be found and cropped and inserted.  Schedules
for creating new content need to be created and maintained and
monitored.

Sounds exhausting, doesn't it?

Here's the good news:  YOU don't need to be the one that does all of the drafting and coaching and revising and posting!

Instead,
work to train a small handful of student editors.  Give them the
username and password to your classroom blog and turn them loose. 
You'll find that they are JUST as capable as you are -- and probably
MORE motivated!

Our #sugarkills team currently has two fully
trained student editors -- Andy and Daniel -- and four other kids who
are "editors in training."  They handle the VAST majority of the nitty
gritty details of generating content for our blog.

Training
student editors makes classroom blogging projects WAY more manageable
for classroom teachers.  More importantly, training student editors
reminds students that THEY can be powerful WITHOUT needing the help of
their teachers.

#beautiful

Tip 3: Recruit Readers and Commenters to Your Blog

For
any blogger, the ultimate reward is crafting a piece that actually gets
READ.  Every page view and comment left on a classroom blog is proof
positive to your students that they DO have an audience and that they
ARE being heard.

Just as importantly to classroom teachers, every
page view and comment is an opportunity for a student blogger to have
their thinking challenged -- and the tension that results whenever
thinking is challenged ALWAYS leads to new learning as students are
forced to refine and revise and polish their positions on the topics
that they care about.

The challenge, however, is that classroom
blogs won't AUTOMATICALLY generate enough attention to receive page
views and comments automatically.  The simple truth is that in a digital
world where there are thousands of new blogs created every hour, "being
heard" isn't nearly as easy as "getting published."

To address
this challenge, I always recruits volunteer readers and commenters when
my students are working on a blogging project.

Most of the time
these volunteers are parents or PTA members who want to help at school
but can't find the time to get away from work during the day.  I ask
them to monitor the blog for a month at a time and to leave two or three
comments a week that are designed to challenge students.

Other
times, I turn to my own professional friends and family members --
pointing them to specific posts that I want to generate traffic for. 
Doing so generates momentum, ensuring that students feel the reward that
comes along with having an audience.

If you are interested in
establishing relationships with other classrooms that are blogging,
spend some time poking around the growing collection of blogs at the Comments4Kids website.  And if you are trying to generate traffic  for individual blog entries, consider sharing a link to the post in Twitter using the #comments4kids hashtag.

Any
of this make sense to you?  More importantly, do YOU have any tips for
teachers interested in starting classroom blogging projects?

_____________________________

Related Radical Reads:

Introducing Our Newest Cause: #SUGARKILLS

Technology Gives Kids Power

Are Kids REALLY Motivated by Technology?

 

 

I've spent the past several weeks grinding my way through several revisions for presentations that I'm giving in the not too distant future and it's left me more than a little emotionally spent. 

In an effort to get back in touch with the creativity that drives me, I grabbed a great Marc Prensky quote and whipped up a new slide tonight:

(Click to dowload slide from Flickr)

Hope you dig it.  More importantly, hope you can use it in your work. 

Rock right on,

Bill

________________________

Related Radical Reads:

Introducing Our Newest Cause: #SUGARKILLS

Change Depends on Something MORE than Shiny iGadgets

Digital Immigrants Unite!

 

Anyone that has spent any length of time following the Radical knows that I can't stand the test-happy culture that we're swimming in.  It's simultaneously stripping the joy out of learning and driving good teachers out of the classroom all in a cheap attempt to declare war on teachers.

What frustrates me the most about today's accountability culture has always been the suggestion that measuring student performance on content-driven multiple choice tests given once per year is the best way to measure the "value that teachers add" to their kids, their schools and their communities

That's ALWAYS sat wrong with me -- and it SHOULD sit wrong with YOU too.  

Teachers do SO much more for our kids than deliver content. We coach and we encourage and we inspire.  We're cheerleaders.  Kids take risks while they are in our classes that they may never have even considered had it not been for the fact that they knew we cared.

But in a world where tests are created with the sole intention of ranking and sorting our teachers, those intangibles -- those small acts of kindness and care that are often the things that keep kids moving forward -- are dismissed, pushed aside by politicians who argue that the only value that matters rests in the results that we can measure with multiple choice exams.

My rants against testing have always felt half-baked to me, though, because I could never back up my assertions with a healthy dose of research -- the Turkish Delight of the #edpolicy kingdom.

Until now, that is. 

You see, a new study from Kirabo Jackson of Northwestern University FINALLY supports my hunch that our single-minded determination to assess and evaluate the cognitive impacts that teachers have on students is flawed policy at best -- and failing our children at worst

What Jackson -- who was interested in determining the impact that cognitive and non-cognitive behaviors have on the future success of students -- discovered should force every parent, politician and policymaker who cares about schools to rethink the role that testing is playing in our buildings. 

First, he discovered that non-cognitive skills and abilities like motivation, determination, and self-restraint are a better predictor of future success -- particularly for struggling students -- than the cognitive skills measured by standardized tests.

Perhaps more importantly, he discovered that SOME teachers are good at increasing the cognitive skills of their students and OTHER teachers are good at increasing the non-cognitive skills of their students, but MOST teachers AREN'T good at increasing BOTH cognitive and non-cognitive skills.

This has HUGE implications, doesn't it? 

If Jackson's research and methodology is sound, current educational policies -- which prioritize test scores when measuring a teacher's value -- are incentivizing the WRONG behaviors. 

Our students are the ultimate losers in environments that encourage teachers to push non-cognitive skills and abilities -- skills and abilities that Jackson argues are actually BETTER indicators of future success -- to the sidelines in response to the cognitive-first realities they are working in.

What politicians who are pushing the testing culture in our schools should REALLY worry about, though, is that educational policies designed to reward teachers for producing results on standardized tests are actually wasting taxpayer cash. 

As Jackson explains:

"Teacher effects on test scores and teacher effects on non-cognitive ability are weakly correlated such that many teachers in the top of test score value-added distribution will also be among the bottom of teachers at improving non-cognitive skills.

This means that a large share of teachers thought to be highly effective based on test score performance will be no better than the average teacher at improving college-going or wages."

And:

"Because variability in outcomes associated with individual teachers that
is unexplained by test scores is not just noise, but is systematically
associated with their ability to improve typically unmeasured
non-cognitive skills, classifying teachers based on their test score
value added will likely lead to large shares of excellent teachers being
deemed poor and vice versa."

Just stew in that for a minute, will you?

We are literally spending MILLIONS of dollars  -- not to mention MILLIONS of instructional hours -- every year measuring the wrong skills and rewarding the wrong teachers!  Sure, mastering the content covered in the K12 curricula matters, but according to Jackson, mastering non-cognitive skills -- skills that we currently do nothing to assess -- matters more!

No joke, y'all:  It's time that you start asking your policymakers some difficult questions about their positions on value-added measures of teacher performance.

If Jackson is right, those policies -- which have rapidly become the norm instead of the exception in most states in America -- are wasting our time AND our money.

____________________________

Related Radical Reads:

Nate Silver on Using Test Scores to Evaluate Teachers

Three Things Parents and Policymakers Need to Know about Merit Pay in Education

What Economists Don't Understand about Educators

 

Last April, Dean Shareski -- a guy that I consider a mentor and a friend -- inadvertently lit a fire under my professional bee-hind with a bit titled Adventures in Assessment.  In it, Dean laid out a pretty simple challenge that I took to heart. 

He wrote:

"So I'm wondering if you're ready to let your students assess
themselves. Not as some experiment where you end up grading them apart
but where you really give the reigns over to them? If not, is it about
trust? Is it about readiness? Fear?

I'm thinking that even 6 year olds should be able to assess themselves. If we give them the tools and expectations."

Since then, I've done a TON of reading about what Dean and assessment expert Rick Stiggins call "student involved assessment." 

Perhaps more importantly, I've tried a TON of different strategies for giving my students more chances to assess their learning.

My reasons are philosophical -- I really DO think that grades are far less important and practical than we make them out to be.  And don't take MY word for it:  Grant Wiggins calls grades an "utterly useless"  source of actionable feedback for ANYONE.  

My reasons are also practical -- I KNOW how important regular feedback on progress can be to building the confidence of learners, but I ALSO KNOW that there are TOO MANY students on my caseload for me to be the ONLY assessor providing feedback!

If my students are TRULY going to reflect daily on their progress towards mastering essential outcomes, they HAVE to become skilled at spotting trends in their OWN learning. 

So I've spent the past year tinkering with integrating opportunities for self-assessment into my classroom practice (see here and here). 

By and large, the experience has been a positive one.  I've learned that my students really CAN assess themselves accurately and really DO enjoy having regular opportunities to track their own progress and growth. 

Those results were pretty surprising, to be honest -- but they've left me looking to find MORE ways to integrate self-assessment into the work that I do with students.

This week, I tried a new Rick Stiggins inspired activity that was designed to help my kids reflect on the progress that they had made in our recent unit on energy. 

You can see it here:

Download 6. Handout_EnergyUnitAnalysisForm

Having just finished all of the lessons and assessments for our unit, I asked my students to look back over the tests that we took to spot patterns in their mastery. 

While it's not clearly detailed on the Unit Analysis form embedded above, I also asked them to confirm the patterns that they were spotting in the other assignments that we tackled during the unit.

Then, I asked my students to think about what they would tell their parents about their progress towards mastering the content covered in our unit. 

"What can you be proud of?" I prompted.  "What are you still working to master?  What in the patterns of progress that you are spotting has left you surprised?  Concerned?"

My goal is to eventually ask every student to fill out an analysis form at the end of every unit -- and then to prepare every student to actually HAVE conversations with their parents about the progress that they are making towards mastering the essential content in our curriculum.

So whaddya' think? 

Does this activity have any merit? 

What do you like about it?  What would you change about it? 

_____________________________

Related Radical Reads:

@shareski's Right: My Students CAN Assess Themselves

My Middle Schoolers LOVE Our Unit Overview Sheets

 

A little over a month ago, I wrote a bit on the role that teachers STILL need to play in helping students to take full advantage of the new opportunities that digital tools make possible for today's learners. 

The argument was a simple one:  Just because our students know how to use digital tools without ever opening up an owner's manual doesn't mean they're going to be able to leverage those same tools to do meaningful work without us. 

The piece spotlighted several Tweets from the articulate, intelligent students in Brad Ovenell-Carter's Vancouver-area high school.  Brad had asked them to reflect on a few questions that I'd asked using their classroom hashtag, #tokafe11.  

Tons of people stopped by to leave comments for me on the bit, including a guy who calls himself "Mr. Chips" who took Brad to task for letting his students post on Twitter under their real names. 

Chips wrote:

"Hmmm ... not too smart of your bright-minded friend to post students feeds under their full names. Nothing wrong with the tweets quoted, but students' identities should be protected.

As educators we should be very cautious how we create digital tattoos that my come back to haunt the students."

It's an interesting take, isn't it -- and one that I suspect MOST educators would agree with. 


We've been taught over and over again that ANYONE under the age of 21 ought to hide behind pseudonyms -- both to cover our own butts and to keep kids safe from "the predators who lurk in the digital night."

But Mr. Chips's comments also fly directly in the face of Will Richardson's argument that schools bear the responsibility of making sure that students are "Well-Googled" on graduation day. 

And contrary to Mr. Chips' snark, Brad IS one of the brightest guys that I know -- so I asked him to respond to Mr. Chips, explaining his rationale behind having kids post on Twitter using their real names.

Here's what he wrote.  It's DEFINITELY worth your time.

_____________________________________

Brad Ovenell-Carter on Digital Footprints Versus "The Brand of Me."

Mr. Chips,

I hear your concern and think you're right...partly. There is a time in our students' lives where they do need us to help them protect their identities.

We have a duty of care that insists on that.

But that same duty of care also insists that we need to prepare our older students to work online -- as themselves.

Any student with a smartphone has wide open access to the web and in Canada, public libraries must also keep an open connection--they're not allowed to block sites.

It's naive to think that by creating pseudonyms in school I am securing what they do out of school on their own Facebook, Twitter, Instagram etc, accounts.

My only option as an adult -- indeed my obligation -- is to coach them, not control them.

If we turn our students out at graduation without having spent time guiding them online in real situations, then we have done them a disservice.

The analogy, I suppose, would be to have them read books about driving a car and then to hand them a set of keys when they receive their diplomas. That would be foolish, I'm sure you agree.

But even if they were to try to remain anonymous, they would have no control over what other people post about them.  

The only possible way to manage your reputation online is to build it yourself.

For this reason, I don't like the terms "digital tattoo" or "digital footprint" -- they're too passive and talk about what you leave behind.

Instead, we talk about the "Brand of Me" and coach our kids on proactively managing their online identity and on becoming good digital citizens, for the reasons Will Richardson talks about.

We take this very seriously at Mulgrave. Our seniors can fly as unaccompanied minors to anywhere on the globe at this age; we need to make sure they can do the same, so to speak, safely online.

As Lucy points out above -- with the courage and conviction of using her real name, I'll point out -- the students feel they are getting good guidance and role modelling here.

I've gathered some of the students' Twitter posts in Storify so you can get their views:

http://sfy.co/hFNW

All the best,

Brad

 

Hmmm ...
not too smart of your bright-minded friend to post students feeds under
their full names. Nothing wrong with the tweets quoted, but students'
identities should be protected. As educators we should be very cautious
how we create digital tattoos that my come back to haunt the students -
See more at:
http://teacherleaders.typepad.com/the_tempered_radical/2013/01/building-...
Hmmm ...
not too smart of your bright-minded friend to post students feeds under
their full names. Nothing wrong with the tweets quoted, but students'
identities should be protected. As educators we should be very cautious
how we create digital tattoos that my come back to haunt the students -
See more at:
http://teacherleaders.typepad.com/the_tempered_radical/2013/01/building-...
Hmmm ...
not too smart of your bright-minded friend to post students feeds under
their full names. Nothing wrong with the tweets quoted, but students'
identities should be protected. As educators we should be very cautious
how we create digital tattoos that my come back to haunt the students -
See more at:
http://teacherleaders.typepad.com/the_tempered_radical/2013/01/building-...

As a visually oriented guy, I've ALWAYS dug infographics as a tool
for quickly communicating information to an audience.  There's something
engaging -- and easy to consume -- about infographics that make them a
really neat tool for capturing the attention of readers.

And
as a guy who believes that students CAN be powerful and CAN have a
voice in today's world, I've always wanted to find ways to introduce my
students to infographics. 

I figure that if they are going to be heard, they've got to start creating content that audiences will actually enjoy.

All
of that thinking boiled to a head when two of my favorite middle school
language arts teachers asked me if I could help them to dream up a
lesson that would engage our students in the process of creating 
infographics.


The first decision that I made was to abandon computers completely in the lesson that I was creating. 

That
was a practical decision in a lot of ways:  First, there simply aren't
enough computers in our building to get all of our 130 students on
machines at the same time.  Best case scenario: We sign up for the
computer lab and get access to 30 desktops for a class period or two.

Even
if we HAD regular access to computers, though, our sixth grade students
just don't have the technical skill necessary to efficiently manipulate
the kinds of programs that graphic artists use to create infographics. 

While I may have been able to teach those skills to my students,
the lesson would have taken weeks instead of days -- and with a MASSIVE
curricula to churn our way through, we didn't have weeks for this
experience.

So I decided to create a kit of paper materials that my kids could draw from while assembling an infographic. 

Much like the digital kits that I recommend to teachers interested in digital movie-making (see here and here),
the paper kit for our infographic project includes a bunch of
pre-assembled content (statistics, facts, hashtags, titles, sources,
dividers, arrows) connected to the topic of our study: The California
Condor -- an endangered bird that we've chosen to adopt.

You can check out the kits -- one includes vertical content and the other includes horizontal content -- here:

CondorInfographicVerticalIMAGES

CondorInfographicHorizontalIMAGES

I used PowerPoint to create the slides that you see in these collections -- and found a TON of helpful and engaging images on The Noun Project website.
The two separate kits work together as one whole collection.  They're
separated simply because infographics need both vertical and horizontal
content to be visually appealing.

Our plan is to
give groups of students paper copies of the entire collection and then
to turn them loose in the hallway to create jumbo-tastic-infographics by
arranging content and then gluing it down to butcher paper. 

Once
they've completed their infographic, they'll be asked (1). to defend
the choices that they make while assembling their infographics and (2).
to evaluate the content, layout and visual appeal of the infographics
created by other groups.

Here's the direction sheet for the assembly and evaluation process:

Handout_InfographicDirections

When
creating the kits for my students, I tried to include enough content
for the kids to assemble a pretty detailed infographic on the plight of
the California Condor.

But I also tried to include
distractors in the collection as well.  There are slides that are
interesting, but wouldn't neatly fit on an infographic that's designed
to raise awareness about the reasons that the Condor is endangered -- or
worthy of our protection. 

That's where the higher-order thinking comes in, right? 

While
my students don't have to do much of the grunt-work associated with
this project -- in an attempt to save time, I've already tracked down
the content that will appear in their infographics  -- they DO have to
make careful choices about what to include in their final products.

My
students also have to think about layout and design. They've got to
find ways to organize the content that I've assembled for them.  They've
got to make sure that their infographic isn't cluttered and that they
use text features to create clear visual divisions in their final
products.

So whaddya' think? 

Does this sound like a worthwhile lesson?

More importantly, do you think it will work?! 

_____________________________

Related Radical Reads:

Infographic Lesson - Cell Phones in Schools

Using Google Docs to Create Digital Kits

More on Using Digital Kits to Structure Student Projects

A few years back, I started a new
category of posts here on the Radical called TWIT -- or THIS Is Why I Teach --
designed to serve as a celebration of the simple joys that come along with
being a classroom teacher and a reminder to me that I really DO enjoy what I
do. 

I realized the other day that it's
been a LONG while since I wrote a TWIT post -- and then the email below ended
up in my inbox
:

Dear Mr. Ferriter,

In my last semester at UNC Chapel
Hill where I double majored in Psychology and Political Science, I took a class
in cognitive development.

Our professor asked the class if
anyone had a vivid memory of something taught in grade school and I raised my
hand.

I told a story about my 6th grade
language arts teacher who came into class and told one side of the room that
they were his favorite students and the other side that they were bad and lazy.

I told them how the good side was given soda and candy and how the bad side was
assigned pages out of a workbook.

You did this demonstration to teach
us about discrimination and injustice and how despite the arbitrariness of the
division, no one spoke out against it.

My professor and the class were
impressed less with my recollection than with the brilliance of your
pedagogical device.

Earlier this past semester in law
school at Georgetown, I was working on a ten day take-home exam memorandum.

I thought about how easy it would be
for students to collaborate on the assignment, breaking the honor code.

I
thought about how the code was less fair to people like me who would choose to
follow it by forcing us to compete with those who would ignore it and benefit
from collaboration.

Then I remembered how Mr. Ferriter
emphatically taught my 6th grade class that it was better to earn an
"F" than to cheat one's way to an "A".

On many occasions like these, I have
been reminded of your teachings.

I often wondered how it was that
under the guise of language arts you taught us so much about ethics and
morality.

I sit here writing this e-mail ten or so years since being in your class
not just because you were a teacher but because you went above and beyond what
was required of you, and as a result, you made a really important difference.

I believe that aside from
parents, teachers wield the most power in deciding what our society will be
like. Thank you for taking advantage of that authority and being such a
positive influence.

I know I am a better person for
having been in your class.

Sincerely,

Bindhu

How's THAT for a pick-me-up after a long week of teaching, huh?!

More importantly, how's THAT for a reminder that everything we do matters more than we can possibly imagine. 

#simpletruth

________________________

Related Radical Reads:

TWIT: They Don't Judge Me by a Test

TWIT: They Write Once in a While

TWIT: They're Learning from Me

 

Syndicate content