Teaching Practice

If you've been reading the Radical for the last few days, you know that I spend last weekend in Philadelphia at the Educon conference. 

That means I'm intellectually spent and WAY behind in almost all of my part time work right now.  Constant conversations and really, really cool interactions with some of the brightest people on earth will do that to you.  As a result, I haven't got a ton of time to write today. 

What I'll do instead is share a handout with you that I created recently for the language arts teacher on my team to use with our kids.

It's designed to walk students through the process of writing a really good 25 word story.  You can download it here:

Download Handout_CanYOUWritea25WordStory

So what's a 25 word story -- and more importantly, why would you want your kids to write them? 

Well, a 25 word story is exactly what it sounds like:  A 25 word story.  It's a writing style that I first discovered by following Kevin Hogdson -- a really remarkable sixth grade language arts teacher -- in Twitter. 

Kevin was regularly writing these incredible stories contained in a single tweet that had a clear beginning, middle and ending.  They were emotional.  They were funny.  They were provocative and they were cool.  And while there doesn't seem to be a ton of people writing them anymore, a little community grew up around the short stories being shared with the #25wordstory hashtag

Here's a sample one of my students wrote this week:



From a language arts perspective, 25 word stories are GREAT activities for middle school kids.  Not only are they perfect for filling the short chunks of time that you might have at the end of a more traditional lesson, they force students to think more carefully about word choice. 

Like I tell my kids, when you only have 25 words, EVERY one is remarkably important. 

Finally, I love 25 word stories because they can be shared in text messages -- the primary form of communication for my students.  That means they can quickly send their stories to a bunch of friends and/or their parents for feedback. 

Instant audience is never a bad thing when you're trying to encourage writing.

Hope this sounds like something you're interested in exploring.  I'd love your feedback on how my handout works with your kids!

______________________________

Related Radical Reads:

What Can YOUR Students Learn from the Romney/Perry Slugfest? [Activity]

Google Search Story Creator [Activity]

 

 

Did you get a chance to read my recent post on creating a culture of "doing" instead of "knowing" in schools?  It has sparked a ton of interest and a bunch of great thinking -- both here on the Radical and in the other spaces that I mentally wrestle in. 

The strand that challenges me the most, however, was best articulated by John Spencer, who wrote: 

I don't think it's a culture "of this, instead of this." Paulo Freire was right when he said it needs to be a cycle of action and reflection. Too much of one and it becomes shallow, close-minded activism. Too much of the other and it becomes useless intellectualism. They're both necessary.

John's point is a simple one:  "Instead" thinking is often unhealthy when it creeps its way into schools -- and to suggest that knowing is fundamentally unimportant would be foolish.

In fact, it would be nearly impossible to successfully take action without a foundational understanding of the content behind the issues and ideas that you care the most about. 

Bradley Zakarin shared similar thinking in Twitter when he wrote:

@plugusin Artificial lines b/t do/know (or action/research) hinder student pursuits at both ends of spectrum. Can DO better w/ KNOWLEDGE.

— Bradley Zakarin (@bzeducon) January 29, 2012

 

Long story short: Balance matters, right?

Here's the thing, though - There IS no balance in schools today.  Curriculum writers and politicians have slapped together courses of study that leave NO ROOM for doing. 

Take the North Carolina sixth grade science curriculum as an example.

We tackle everything from a study of the layers of the earth and the formation of minerals to the way that light, sound and heat transfer energy.  We look at why humans should protect soil, how space exploration has benefited mankind, and how species adapt to their habitats. 

We talk about the differences between the planets.  We look at earthquake and volcano patterns.  We learn about convection and conduction.  We wrestle with symbiosis, mutualism and parasitism.  We examine food chains.  We study the parts of waves -- both transverse and longitudinal.  We look at convex and concave lenses.

We study the parts of the eye and ear.  We discuss the Law of Conservation of Energy. We explore the differences between potential and kinetic energy.  We learn about how the gravitational pull of the sun and the moon influence the earth.

Are you starting to get a sense for just HOW massive the knowing part of our curriculum really is?

The results are really quite simple:  There's not a whole heck of a lot of time for doing in classrooms.

Here's a tangible example of how this changes the instructional decisions made by teachers:  Marsha Ratzel -- a buddy of mine teaching science in Kansas -- introduced me to the Science for Citizens website yesterday. 

She describes it like this:

Science for Citizens offers regular folks like me (if I'm regular I guess) the chance to participate in science projects from right where we live, doing pretty normal stuff and then sending in what we learn to the principal investigators.

Can't get much more "doing" than that, can you? 

But here's the hitch:  While I LOVE the idea of getting my kids involved in projects that would give them a chance to be a part of a much larger community of practicing scientists -- a lesson I think is pretty darn important for them to learn -- I literally WORRY about incorporating any of the projects into my classroom because I'm already  a month behind in my curriculum. 

The moral of the story is that I believe in balance too.  We can't throw the content baby out with the bathwater.  "Instead" thinking really isn't any healthier for schools than "Yeah, But" thinking.

But let's not pretend that what we have in schools now is a finely balanced knowing-doing experience. 

From my point of view, we're not "doing" much more than sprinting our way to know-where.

Any of this make sense?  Do y'all feel that the knowing-doing balance is out of whack in your worlds too, or do your kids have plenty of chances to take an action-stance towards their content -- and more importantly, their communities?

____________________________

Related Radical Reads:

What If Schools Created a Culture of Do INSTEAD of a Culture of Know?

Stuffing Kids with Content

Brainpop and the Overloaded Curriculum

Skills Matter More than Tools

 

 

 

Here at Educon yesterday, I had the chance to learn a bit more about design thinking from David Jakes

David's central point was that schools and teachers often get stuck in a "Yeah, but..." mindset when thinking about change. Instead of dreaming about what's possible -- taking a "What if" stance towards the challenges standing in our way -- we're all too ready to trip over the hurdles in front of us without even attempting to jump. 

David asked each table group to come up with a "What if" question spotlighting a more positive -- and possible -- future for classrooms and then to break that question down into the tangible steps that schools and teachers would need to take in order to move towards that future.

Here's a graphic organizer detailing what Kristen Swanson, Patrick Larkin, Larry Fliegelman and I came up with:

(click to enlarge)

 

Our key question is a good one, isn't it? 

What IF schools created a culture of "DO" instead of a culture of "KNOW?" Doesn't that action-oriented stance reflect the kind of real-world learning environment that we know resonates with kids? 

More importantly, don't we WANT kids who see themselves as living, breathing contributors to the world around them rather than simply as little people locked away behind our walls waiting to be released?

Of course, we'd have to work to take active steps to redefine almost everything about our schools if a culture of "Do" is really going to be possible.  Grading will need to change -- from a focus on content mastery to a focus on demonstration of an ability to apply content in novel situations.

Purchasing and budget decisions would have to change -- from a commitment to buying containers holding content (read: textbooks) to a commitment to giving kids opportunities to interact with their worlds. 

The rules that govern how kids advance from one grade level to the next would need to change -- from an emphasis on hours spent in seats to an emphasis on the use of artifacts to prove levels of mastery that we're comfortable with.

So this all sounds great, right -- but how do you move forward with what seems like such a significant change?

That depends on your role in the system.  As a principal, Larry was ready to start rethinking purchasing decisions starting on Monday morning, placing an emphasis on spending that encouraged doing instead of just knowing. 

Patrick -- also a principal -- was ready to begin moving towards creating a separate track in his high school that parents who were interested in a "doing" experience for their kids could opt into, knowing that it would be non-traditional in almost every way. 

Kristen and I are convinced that most teachers could begin creating learning opportunities that allowed our kids to work independently -- and interdependently -- on meaningful tasks without much trouble.

The key point -- as David would argue -- is that EVERYONE needs to move forward.  Find a step you can take tomorrow.  Find a step that you take a week from now.  A month from now.  A year from now.

But move forward.  Give up the "Yeah, buts" and start asking "What if . . ."

After my recent rant on the sad state of technology in schools, Gerry Varty -- a regular Radical reader and good friend working as an assistant superintendent for the Wolf Creek Public Schools in Canada -- dropped me an email looking to cheer me up.

He pointed me to this hilarious clip from a new Canadian #educentered sitcom.  In it, Mr. D figures out a new way to speed-grade essays written by his students and then ropes a buddy into helping him work through the stack over beers at the bar:

 

 

Here's what worries me, y'all:  I've BEEN Mr. D more than once during the course of my career.  The truth is that grading essays can be a grind -- and even when I use rubrics to give targeted feedback or when I focus on ONE criteria -- student voice, proper mechanics, organization, content -- to save time while grading a written task, I end up overwhelmed. 

This is nothing more than a function of simple math:  I serve 120 students every day.  Giving good feedback on an individual essay takes about 5-7 minutes.  That's 12 hours of grading per task.  After attending meetings, filling out paperwork and answering my email, I have about 30 minutes free each day to plan and to give students feedback.  

The result: I skim my way through papers on a good day and I completely stop asking challenging questions that require anything more than multiple choice responses on a bad one. 

To be honest, that confession leaves me just short of completely ashamed. 

Out of all of the tasks that I'm charged with, NOTHING is more important than giving my students tasks that challenge their thinking and force them to demonstrate sophisticated understandings of the content and skills that we all care about.

More importantly, NOTHING is more important than giving my students timely, targeted feedback on their levels of mastery.  Without detailed feedback highlighting strengths and weaknesses, students don't grow as learners. 

But NOTHING about the current structure of schools makes timely, targeted feedback on tasks that require complex responses from kids doable.  Our class periods are too short, our student loads are too large, and our time away from students is increasingly filled by requirements that draw us away from important individual tasks like planning and grading.

#frustrating

#frightening

#anotheredufail

__________________________

Related Radical Reads:

Is REAL Formative Assessment Even Possible? 

Assessment's Either/Or Conundrum

Assessing Learning the Danish Way

Your Data Dream. My Data Nightmare


Cranky Blogger Warning: From time to time here on the Radical, I feel like a ranting lunatic driven by emotion rather than solution-oriented blogger driven by reason.  Now might just be one of those times.  Take what I write tonight with a grain of salt -- or a gallon of gin.  Dealer's choice.

__________________________________________

Poke through my thoughts about technology's role in public education and you'll hear me preach over and over again about the importance of working to transform teaching REGARDLESS of the number of computers you have in your classroom.

That's a very personal message simply because I don't live in a 1:1 world. 

Heck, I don't even live in a 10:1 world.

Like most teachers, I've spent the better part of the past decade making due with limited access to labs with dozens of computers in need of Flash updates.  Sure, we've got a few laptop carts -- but they've sadly become dilapidated wrecks that we can't afford to replace. 

#soundfamiliar?

For the most part, I've tried to be tolerant of that reality. More importantly, I've consistently encouraged anyone who bothers to listen to be tolerant of that reality, too.

"It's not like your schools and districts don't WANT to provide you with access to the kinds of digital tools that you need in order to change teaching and learning in your classroom," I preach.  "It's just darn near impossible to appropriately outfit classrooms given the limits of district budgets."

There's some truth in there, right?

Times HAVE been unusually tight.  Geez - here in North Carolina there hasn't even been money to give teachers cost-of-living adjustments in the past 4 years.  Where ARE we supposed to get the cash to invest in classroom technology.

#soundfamiliar?

But I'm sick of being tolerant, y'all. 

I'm sick of hearing critics hammer teachers for being resistant to change while I'm STILL sitting in cut-and-paste classrooms full of textbooks, glue sticks and safety scissors.  I'm sick of educational soothsayers conjuring up visions of 21st Century learning environments that I'll NEVER be able to create with the three working computers plugged into the corner of my classroom. 

I'm sick of telling my students that they'll have to wait until they get home to answer the questions that they care the most about.  I'm sick of standing in line behind twelve other teachers waiting to make photocopies because handouts are the only instructional resource that we have consistent access to. 

#soundfamiliar?

Most importantly, I'm sick of pretending that I stand a chance of convincing kids who understand just how personalized and engaging learning can be that my ridiculously quaint, completely unplugged, intellectually standardized classroom is anything OTHER than a big, fat waste of time.

The genie's out of the bottle, y'all. 

Like Scott McLeod recently argued, our kids KNOW that traditional learning environments are irrelevant -- and pretty much everyone with a pulse KNOWS that our schools need to change, but NO ONE is willing to put their money where their mouths are. 

You (and I don't care if "you" are a pundit, a parent or a politician) want to see my instruction change?

Find a way to give me some new tools to experiment with. 

I don't care how you do it. Force through some ridiculously sick bond referendum earmarked for technology and technology only.  Figure out a way to make Bring Your Own Device Programs work in your communities.  Pass the hat at Chamber of Commerce meetings. 

But whatever you do, quit ranting about the crappy job I'M doing until YOU'RE actually willing to pony up some cabbage or to help cut through red tape to create solutions that give me a fighting chance of actually doing my job well.

Quit crying about the dioramas my kids are making when the supply closet is chock-a-block full of crayolas.  Quit acting so surprised that my kids aren't networking with the world when the only lenses that we have to look through are dated textbooks.  Quit asking for "timely feedback" when I'm collecting data by hand with clipboards and post-it notes.  

I guess what I'm saying is quit asking me to perform instructional miracles.

My well of professional tolerance has run dry. 

#soundfamiliar?

(Glad I got that off my chest.  I almost feel better already.  Now where's my red checking pen? I have essays to grade.)

_________________________________

Related Radical Reads:

How Limited Technology Budgets Failed My Students

More on the Challenges of Wondering in Schools

Your Data Dream. My Data Nightmare

 

As most Radical readers know, I'm the author of Teaching the iGeneration -- a title designed to introduce teachers to ways that technology can be used to design lessons that give students opportunities to experiment with essential skills like collaboration, information management and persuasion. 

It's probably the title that I'm most proud of because it is incredibly practical

I've shared everything that I know about good teaching in the 21st Century.  Readers -- especially those teaching middle and high schoolers -- should be able to pick up Teaching the iGeneration and begin changing their work immediately. 

That's why YOU -- or the teachers in YOUR school -- might be interested in a series of two-day workshops that I'm delivering this spring.

Sponsored by Solution Tree, I'll be in Boston, Orlando and Dallas in March and April. 

Each workshop is designed to help teachers find logical first steps towards integrating technology into their instruction.  We'll look at the changing nature of today's learners and discuss the disconnect between the learning spaces that we've created and the learning spaces that our kids crave. 

We'll talk about the strategies that efficient learners take to manage the crush of information in today's hyper-connected world.  We'll examine the differences between students who use social spaces for networking and social spaces for learning. 

We'll explore the changing nature of persuasion in a visual world and talk about how students can generate their own audiences for the issues they care about.

Most importantly, we'll look for overlaps between the work we are CURRENTLY doing and the work that we SHOULD be doing in schools.  We'll innovate at the edges of the box and build bridges between what we know about efficient learning and what our students know about new tools. 

Interested in learning more? 

Then check out the slides that I used for a Teaching the iGeneration workshop in Union County, North Carolina last week and check out the session wiki where most of the resources for my iGeneration workshops are housed:

 

Teaching the iGeneration: Union County 2012
View more presentations from wferriter

 

Then, explore the thoughts that Lesa Goodman -- an eighth grade teacher in Union County -- shared on her blog after spending two days learning with me:

Lesa's Day One Reflection

Lesa's Day Two Reflection

Finally, you can learn more about me -- and the digital work that I do with students -- by checking out my presenter page on the Solution Tree website

What I hope you'll find is that my status as a full time, real live, bona fide practicing classroom teacher brings credibility to conversations about teaching and learning with technology.  Everything that I share with audiences are lessons learned through experience -- and that matters. 

Hope you'll consider coming to a workshop this spring -- and bringing friends! 

There's nothing that I like more than a room full of passionate practitioners who are interested in reimagining the work that we do with kids.

_________________________________

Related Radical Reads:

What are YOU Using Technology For?

Making Good Technology Choices

Innovation and Intellectual Collisions

 

Let me come clean with y'all:  I LOVE reading nonfiction.  In fact, if you were to look at the 200 titles on my Kindle, you'd find about 12 that are fiction. 

More importantly, I think we do students a disservice when we fail to introduce great nonfiction reads to middle schoolers. 

The fact of the matter is that the majority of reading students will do to prepare for careers will be nonfiction. That means they've GOT to learn to love it -- and that's why I think biographies are so important.

Because biographies resemble the stories that kids have spent their whole lives reading, they are the PERFECT gateway into the world of nonfiction.

That's the theme of this week's Minute for Change podcast:

 

 

Here's three biographies that your students are likely to love:

The Great and Only Barnum : Not only will kids chuckle at the hilarity in Barnum's life story, they'll love wrestling with the morals behind a man who made money hand-over-fist by putting bearded ladies, Siamese twins, and crippled old women on display for the entire world to gawk at. 

Escape - The Story of the Great Houdini : There's something magical about magic, isn't there?!  And even today, there's something magical about the life of America's greatest magician.  Even in an era where seeing it is believing it, the stories of a long-forgotten Houdini will capture your kids' imaginations.

Mao's Last Dancer : Let's face it - Middle schoolers are passionate about wrestling with what's fair and what's unfair.  That makes any book connected to life in Communist China -- a place of almost incomprehensible injustice -- an interesting read. 

This title -- which details the life story of a poor Chinese boy who grew up hating America only to discover that everything he'd been taught was nothing but a lie -- gives students the chance to think about the role that governments play in keeping people down. 

So when ARE you going to start taking practical steps to introduce students to interersting biographies

#theymatter

___________________________________

Related Radical Reads:

Reading is NOT Optional

Real Men Read

 

 

On January 10, noted YA author Walter Dean Myers will officially begin his two year term as the National Ambassador for Young People's Literature, and while these kinds of titles usually seem completely useless to me, I'm pretty excited by Myers for one simple reason:

His passion is making sure that EVERY kid -- especially those living in the kinds of tough circumstances that he grew up in -- embraces reading.


Download Slide_ReadingIsNotOptional

 

Myers minces no words in this interview with Publisher's Weekly. He writes:

“We all know we should eat right and we should exercise, but reading is treated as if it’s this wonderful adjunct...We’re still thinking in terms of enticing kids to read with a sports book or a book about war.

We’re suggesting that they’re missing something if they don’t read but, actually, we’re condemning kids to a lesser life.

If you had a sick patient, you would not try to entice them to take their medicine. You would tell them, ‘Take this or you’re going to die.’ We need to tell kids flat out: reading is not optional.”

Listen to those words, y'all.  Let them roll around in your mind for a few minutes.  Stew in them.  We ARE condemning kids to a lesser life when we turn the urgency of reading into an option

But all too often -- and especially for kids who grow up in families that don't celebrate and model reading -- that's EXACTLY what we're doing. 

We're convinced that simple incentive programs, or trendy genres like graphic novels, or finding just the right book, will EVENTUALLy hook reluctant readers, so we show foolish patience instead of attacking literacy struggles with a passion.  

That kind of professional tap dancing around the truth is nothing but a waste of time -- and I'm completely jazzed to see that we've finally got a spokesperson who is willing to say so. 

______________________________

Related Radical Reads:

Real Men Read

The Unintended Consequences of Incentive Programs

Wondering (Worrying?) About Graphic Novels

 

 

Original Image Credit: Syringe by Andres Rueda

Licensed Creative Commons Attribution on January 6, 2011

A few months ago, I stumbled across an interesting new Google tool in a Kyle Pace blog post.  Called the Search Story Creator, it allows users to create 30 second videos of the screens that appear when they are searching for particular topics.

Kyle use of the Search Story Creator -- he created a sample commercial to advertise a political candidate -- got me thinking that Google's newest gizmo could be a great tool for having kids practice visual persuasion during the upcoming election season. 

But instead of using the Search Story Creator to generate a commercial about a candidate, I thought having students create a commercial trying to influence people around a particular issue might make sense. 

Specifically, I wanted to create a task that would make kids think through what candidates AREN'T saying about hot-button issues.  Doing so would serve as a tangible reminder that there are two sides to every political story even if candidates aren't always willing to consider them.  

So I whipped up a few samples of search stories built around political issues that teachers could share with students starting a similar project.

Here's one questioning Barack Obama's position on universal health care:

 

And here's one questioning Newt Gingrich's positions on immigration:

 

They're pretty interesting products, aren't they?  Forcing kids to ask unanswered questions about the positions that candidates take on issues requires higher level thinking AND a deep understanding of political issues.  

More importantly, it would encourage the kinds of behaviors that characterize the savviest citizens in any democracy.  For too long, politics has been driven by an unquestioned allegiance to individual parties.  It's about time that we start to remind our kids that questioning candidates matters. 

These kinds of products are also pretty easy to create

Here's a handout that your students can use to craft their own search stories on the political issues that matter the most to them:

Download Handout_ElectionThemedGoogleSearchStories

Overall, I think the Search Story Creator is a new tool worth exploring

Not only does it generate an interesting and potentially influential visual product -- something that students MUST master if they are going to be persuasive in tomorrow's world -- it forces kids to think through the kinds of questions that can result in more meaningful learning about controversial topics.

I also like how approachable the Search Story Creator is.  Once students have thought through the kinds of questions that they want to include in their final products, Google does the rest -- from including background music and choosing transitions to uploading videos to YouTube.

That matters to me.  Whenever I'm working with technology, I want my kids focused on content, not on mastering new pieces of software or wrestling with technical processes.  The less time that my kids spend tinkering with tools, the more time they can spend thinking through key ideas.

That doesn't mean, however, that Google's Search Story Creator is perfect -- final products are limited to 30 seconds, which is barely enough time to tell a meaningful story and users can't make any individual enhancements to the screen captures that appear in their search stories even if they wanted to -- but there are definitely classroom applications here.

Whaddya' think?  Is this a tool that you think you could use with your students?

___________________________

Related Radical Reads:

Google's Reading Level Search Feature

Google's Redesigned Related Searches Feature

Working Together with Wikis and Google Docs

 

 

If you've read the Radical for any length of time, you'll know that I pretty much despise the carrot-and-stick approach to managing teachers and students that seems to be all the rage in education right now (see here, here and here).

What's completely wild is that many of the top organizational thinkers who are working largely in fields beyond education -- including Authorspeak Keynote presenter Daniel Pink -- agree that incentive programs almost NEVER work.


Download Slide_ThePerfectCarrot

 

Chip and Dan Heath -- authors of a TON of great reads including The Myth of the Garage, a completely free Corwin eBook -- are no less critical of our fascination with incentive programs than Pink.

In Myth of the Garage, they compare incentive programs to the popular urban legend of a Darwin Award winner who strapped a rocket engine to his Chevy Impala looking for the ultimate joy ride only to end up "as a human flapjack" on the side of a lonely Arizona mountain.

The Heaths write:

Incentives are like that jet engine.  There's no question the engine will take you somewhere, fast, but it's not always clear where.  Or who you're going to mow down on the way.

Yet incentives are still the first resort of most managers.  We all think we're smart enough to create the perfect carrot.

(Kindle locations 357-363)

So what makes incentive programs so dangerous -- particularly in fields like education?

According to Chip and Dan Heath, incentive programs inevitably cause well-intentioned people to fall victim to a focusing illusion.  Instead of taking multiple measures into account when judging performance, we overemphasize the single variable that we are attempting to measure.

In other words, when all you are worried about measuring is how fast your car can fly down a dry desert lakebed, you tend to forget about the mountain that you're sprinting towards at 300 miles per hour. 

The Heaths write:

"To be fair, there are some contexts where one variable dominates.  If you're employing a field sales rep who is selling a simple, self-contained product, then it probably makes sense to tie incentives to the sale.

If you're traveling a long, straight road, the jet engine will get you there faster.

But chances are you don't live in a one-variable world.  In your complicated, squishy, matrixed world, if you're dreaming up an incentive plan, you're almost certainly in the grips of a focusing illusion."

(Kindle locations 386-391)

Now, I don't know about you, but I can't think of a MORE "complicated, squishy, matrixed world" than education

The honest truth is that we -- teachers, principals, parents, policymakers, community leaders, students -- DO care about multiple variables when looking at the outcomes of education.

Sure we want students to become better readers and writers.  Sure, mathematical competency is an essential outcome for every student. 

But in an era when incentives -- and pretty darn serious consequences -- for both teachers and students have been tied to just two testable variables, I've GOT to believe that we're in the grips of one seriously wicked focusing illusion too. 

My only hope is that we'll come to our senses and switch off the rocket before we run out of road.

_______________________________________

Related Radical Reads:

Bulldozing the Forests

The Monster You've Created

Statistically Snookered

The Unintended Consequence of Incentive Programs in Schools

 

 

 

Original Image Credit: Minty Python’s Frying Circuits 5/52 by Neal

Licensed Creative Commons Attribution on December 23, 2011

 

 

 

Syndicate content